> > OK, I didn't try that, so it is allowed to define a type
> > as a pointer to a type that is defined later.
> Yes, but _only_ if the type declaration comes _immediately_ after
> the pointer type declaration. So you can't just declare a bunch
> of pointer types and defer the actual type-declara
When making a DLL, I noticed that certain compiler options must be off in order
for it
to work.
Problem:
I had both strip symbols option on and smart linking options on. The DLL did
not work
(properly). Gave exceptions.
Solution:
I took all three of those options off and now the DLL works (prop
