> > OK, I didn't try that, so it is allowed to define a type
> > as a pointer to a type that is defined later.
> Yes, but _only_ if the type declaration comes _immediately_ after
> the pointer type declaration. So you can't just declare a bunch
> of pointer types and defer the actual type-declaration to a later
> point, that won't work.
To clarify, you can actually have many additional types between
the pointer type and the record definition, as long as you
don't introduce another section keyword that "turns off"
the current "type" section.
For instance, this will work:
type
pMyRec = ^tMyRec; // forward declaration
MyInt = integer;
MyArray = array[0..255] of char;
{ Hundreds more typedef's could go here }
tMyRec = Record // actual definition
data:pointer;
next:pMyRec;
end;
But the next example will NOT work, because the
additional "type" keyword separates the two types:
type pMyRec = ^tMyRec;
type tMyRec = Record
data:pointer;
next:pMyRec;
end;
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
