Re: [fpc-pascal]Delphi "9" language features...

2004-08-13 Thread Thomas Schatzl
Hello, Exactly, which is why I prefer the idea Borland has gone for. The STL is not a good idea. The behaviour of the d9 iterators appear to me very unspecific. In which I think this is because the origin of this information is only a blog entry, no specification... order does it iterate throu

Re: [fpc-pascal]Delphi "9" language features...

2004-08-13 Thread Dean Zobec
Matt Emson wrote: Exactly, which is why I prefer the idea Borland has gone for. The STL is not a good idea. Delphi doesn't have a decent containers library. TObjectList is derived from TList instead as being designed as a wrapper (if Borland had read the Danny Thorpe's book they would not imp

Re: [fpc-pascal]Delphi "9" language features...

2004-08-13 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Matt Emson wrote: I don't like the very unspecific implementation. In [SNIP, as this is a matter of opinion, replace this with "other"] That's what I meant however my keyboard ate it ;) languages/libraries there are several kinds of iterators, see e.g. the STL. Exactly, which is why I prefer the i