I don't like the very unspecific implementation. In [SNIP, as this is a
matter of opinion, replace this with "other"]
That's what I meant however my keyboard ate it ;)
languages/libraries there are several kinds of iterators, see e.g. the
STL.
Exactly, which is why I prefer the idea Borland has gone for. The STL is not a good idea.
The behaviour of the d9 iterators appear to me very unspecific. In which order does it iterate through the elements? What happens if I delete an element while iterating, maybe even the current. Does an iterator stay valid if I remove the element from the container? How can I change how the iterator behaves? etc.
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
