In our previous episode, Paul Breneman said:
>
> I got a new file (fpcup1) today using the "-O outputfilename" on the
> wget like Ewald suggested. They both fail to run.
>
> ls -l fpcup*
> -rwxr--r-- 1 test test 875240 Jul 28 20:41 fpcup
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 test test 875240 Jul 29 10:22 fpcup1
>
>
On 07/29/2015 12:25 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
On 07/29/2015 08:23 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Paul Breneman said:
* The text below is from that wiki page *
This downloads a file (875240 bytes) but can't execute it (help needed):
wget
https://github.com/LongDirt
On 07/29/2015 08:23 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Paul Breneman said:
* The text below is from that wiki page *
This downloads a file (875240 bytes) but can't execute it (help needed):
wget
https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/Reiniero-fpcup/blob/master/bin/i386-l
On 07/29/2015 01:40 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
>
> I started my first Free Pascal wiki page weeks ago:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/Small_Virtual_Machines
>
> * The text below is from that wiki page *
> This downloads a file (875240 bytes) but can't execute it (help needed):
> wget
> https:
In our previous episode, Paul Breneman said:
> * The text below is from that wiki page *
> This downloads a file (875240 bytes) but can't execute it (help needed):
> wget
> https://github.com/LongDirtyAnimAlf/Reiniero-fpcup/blob/master/bin/i386-linux/fpcup_linux_x86?raw=true
>
> --no-che
On 05/24/2015 02:24 PM, Paul Breneman wrote:
On 05/19/2015 02:19 AM, Alfred wrote:
@vfclists
This was a regression ... should be fixed by now.
@florian
Importing should have been done !
However, this all started as a not-too-serious attempt by me to get
fpcup running again.
I must say its not
On 19.05.2015 09:19, Alfred wrote:
I must say its not easy to maintain/understand code without
possibility to consult the author.
Hello, that reminded me; there is one more forum/list member who worked
with Reinier on fpcup, Ludo Brands. I'm not sure for how long have he
been involved in the
On 05/19/2015 02:19 AM, Alfred wrote:
@vfclists
This was a regression ... should be fixed by now.
@florian
Importing should have been done !
However, this all started as a not-too-serious attempt by me to get
fpcup running again.
I must say its not easy to maintain/understand code without possi
On 12 May 2015 at 21:32, Alfred wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a message from "JuhaManninen" on the Lazarus forum:
>
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.0.html?PHPSESSID=bf43911005bf788ab072b3d73d1bfb4f
>
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.msg177117
Am 12.05.2015 um 22:32 schrieb Alfred:
> Hello,
>
> I got a message from "JuhaManninen" on the Lazarus forum:
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.0.html?PHPSESSID=bf43911005bf788ab072b3d73d1bfb4f
>
>
> http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,27211.msg177117
On Sun, February 22, 2015 07:02, Anthony Walter wrote:
> I've tried fpcup a few times in the past and have always had problems with
> it not working as expected. I current;y maint what I think is a well
> formed
> set of scripts for mac, linux, and mac installers on githhub:
>
> https://github.com/
I've tried fpcup a few times in the past and have always had problems with
it not working as expected. I current;y maint what I think is a well formed
set of scripts for mac, linux, and mac installers on githhub:
https://github.com/sysrpl/Codebot.Setup/blob/master/linux/install.fpc-3.0.linux.sh#L1
On Sat, February 21, 2015 17:46, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Tomas Hajny wrote:
>> On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode,
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
rare that new people are interested to improve a to
On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
>>> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
be ignored.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
be ignored.
Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer
from
Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
>> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
>> be ignored.
>>
>> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer
>> from outside, can he get commit access f
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
So, if there is any interest, I can set up a repo for it.
How easily would a new maintainer get commit rights there?
You just need to ask. It is a separate repo, so that should not be a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> So, if there is any interest, I can set up a repo for it.
How easily would a new maintainer get commit rights there?
Juha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lis
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted to
that.
FPCUP also has a GUI frontend. Can it be maintained there as well?
Yes, but a GUI cannot be built as part of
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted to
> that.
FPCUP also has a GUI frontend. Can it be maintained there as well?
I start to think this tool should be maintained somewhere else.
FPC developers are not
In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
> be ignored.
>
> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer
> from outside, can he get commit access for it?
My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc F
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Tomas Hajny wrote:
> However, if there is someone else willing to take it over, it's probably
> fine as well, isn't it?
My thoughts exactly. FPC devels have hands full of work already. It is
rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not
be
On Sat, February 21, 2015 10:40, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
>> > That's not how I interpreted his posts, particularly his last one
>> which he
>> > might have posted after you sent this email...
>>
>> He wrote "By no means I am pushing myself as the new
In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said:
> > That's not how I interpreted his posts, particularly his last one which he
> > might have posted after you sent this email...
>
> He wrote "By no means I am pushing myself as the new maintainer" which
> I interpreted as "I would gladly maintain it b
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Michael Thompson
wrote:
> That's not how I interpreted his posts, particularly his last one which he
> might have posted after you sent this email...
He wrote "By no means I am pushing myself as the new maintainer" which
I interpreted as "I would gladly maintain i
On 21 February 2015 at 03:45, Juha Manninen
wrote:
> "DonAlfredo" appears to have motivation to maintain it.
>
That's not how I interpreted his posts, particularly his last one which he
might have posted after you sent this email...
Mike
___
fpc-devel
27 matches
Mail list logo
