On Sat, February 21, 2015 15:32, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> Am 21.02.2015 11:17, schrieb Marco van de Voort: >>> In our previous episode, Juha Manninen said: >>>> rare that new people are interested to improve a tool, it should not >>>> be ignored. >>>> >>>> Should it be under FPC sources? If there is a motivated maintainer >>>> from outside, can he get commit access for it? >>> >>> My suggestion was to put it in fpcbuild, iirc Florian hasn't reacted to >>> that. >> >> Hmmm, I thought I did. At least I think for now that we should keep it >> separate and see how things evolve. fpcbuild is for now a too strong >> commitment imo. > > Indeed. As I proposed: a separate SVN repo is not a problem.
May I remind fpcprojects again? ;-) Tomas _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
