omeone, with or without the smile in the end of the
sentence.
- "obscurity helps with security" was following the argument and at this
point I have to say I'm just disappointed with this mindset coming from
inside the Boarder :-(
After that, I was
) and read
them carefully.
> With my thoughts and my doubts, yesterday I approached the Treasurer (who
> > is also member of the Travel Committee) and asked her about those things
> > and I'd like to share my disappointment with the answers.
> > [comments deleted]
>
ntext and context is not ours to
> publish. I also assured you that they are recorded properly, as that
> seemed to be of concern to you, and the board also has access to them
> in case the board ever wants to audit them.
>
> I believe you when you say t
And what about have a list of sponsored people?
As I asked before, GNOME Foundation already asks people to written down a
blog post with the stamp, showing that they were sponsored by GNOME
Foundation.
Considering that it can discourage applications, should GNOME Foundation
keep asking people
tail opened would help people to
> understand this kind of situation without have to argue with you and hear
> those kind of answers.
>
Here is the whole conversation where, according to Ekaterina, I *strongly*
imply that the board and the travel committee are corrupt:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> On 6 June 2014 07:38, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:20 A
> >> >> 3) Check if the values spent are okay
> >> >
> >> > Here I am unsure what you are asking
Hello David,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:24 AM, David King wrote:
> Hi Fabiano
>
>
> On 2014-06-06 09:09, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
>> Here is the whole conversation where, according to Ekaterina, I *strongly*
>> imply that the board and the travel committee are corru
Bastien,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:27 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
>
> > With or without a good reason, you took the non-polite way to answer.
> > Why? I don't know, seriously.
>
> When discussing s
more doubts and I
hope I can ask the doubts here.
3) I offended someone, my apologies.
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
SD that the organization receives..
It was in this way for the 2 years I've been a GSoC student.
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
ME Foundation's
money (as Sébastien seems to be), could approach the Board with concrete
suggestions based on real data, not only on based on "guessing".
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> > I do believe GNOME Foundation should have a clear (and well documented)
> way
> > for people raising their questions wrt how the GNOME Foundation'
his info would be awesome for attracting more donations.
2) I understand that 80K USD are the estimated amount of money needed.
But what can Foundation do if the amount raised is less than this?
Does Foundation have goals/clear idea about how to proceed if we can
just raise 40K USD? Clear goals, even if Fou
is an ethical problem?
5) If we don't find any bank that can provide a service without run a
nonfree software, what would be your recommendation?
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Jan 1, 2015 5:23 PM, "Alexandre Franke"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio
wrote:
> > 4) If not, considering that your bank have some people running nonfree
> > software, should not we close the bank account once we would be paying
&
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>> > 4) If not, considering that your bank have some people running nonfree
>>> > software, should not we close the bank account once we would be pay
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Alexandre Franke
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>> Can you be more explicit about what you mean with "tools used to do
>>> your/the bank transactions run nonfree software"
>>
>>
17 matches
Mail list logo
