On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM, private musings wrote:
> On a tangential note, I've also been looking at various governmental, and
> NGO 'codes of conduct', some of which recommend things like accurate record
> keeping on model information, ensuring users confirm that they wish to view
> materia
heh - as I say in the essay (and the noticeboard) - oh the irony!
My hands are indeed filthy - although I never went blind ;-) - and yes, we
still need to talk about this stuff.
cheers,
Peter,
PM.
> How about 'unclean hands'.
>
> In the recent en.wp discussion that you mention, you added an im
Hi,
As has been mentioned elsewhere in comments on your writings, you have
good ideas which aren't directly related to nudity or sexual content.
1) respect human subjects of photos and other media
1a) get explicit model consent, both for models who are 'many meters
away' and for significant mode
--- On Mon, 4/20/09, Samuel Klein wrote:
> From: Samuel Klein
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Principle and pragmatism with nudity and sexual
> content
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
> Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 3:39 AM
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:19 AM, private musings
> wrot
2009/4/20 Birgitte SB :
> I second this. Does anyone really believe it is even possible to set one
> standard of what it means to be 'collegial' and 'collaborative' for all
> cultures? These things are not absolute values and each community needs to
> work out what standards are most pragmatic
> --- On Mon, 4/20/09, Samuel Klein wrote:
>
>> From: Samuel Klein
>> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Principle and pragmatism with nudity and sexual
>> content
>> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"
>> Date: Monday, April 20, 2009, 3:39 AM
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:19 AM, private musing
Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
not sure what to answer.
The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
http://wikimediafoundation.o
Florence Devouard wrote:
> Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am
> not sure what to answer.
>
> The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>
>
> Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in d
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Florence Devouard wrote:
> By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
> english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
> the change of licence ?
>
> With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the impact of the
>
2009/4/20 Florence Devouard :
> Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:License_update
> Refers to
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
To my knowledge, the jurisdictional variant URL wasn't intentionally
chosen in
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard wrote:
> By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
> english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
> the change of licence ?
>
> With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the impact of the
> l
Jim Redmond wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard wrote:
>
>> By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
>> english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
>> the change of licence ?
>>
>> With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems
This being Volunteer Appreciation week in the US, I thought it was a
great chance for me to post to this list and post a Wikimedia blog
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/04/20/volunteer-appreciation/. I want to
thank everyone for being so welcoming. I am very excited about this
organization and th
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:18 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Birgitte SB :
>
>> I second this. Does anyone really believe it is even possible to set one
>> standard of what it means to be 'collegial' and 'collaborative' for all
>> cultures? These things are not absolute values and each comm
2009/4/17 Thomas de Souza Buckup :
> Erik,
>
> Congratulations! The results of this survey will be very useful for all of
> us. Could you please answer a couple of questions:
>
> - Can they/you/we "wiki" the results on Meta?
> - When will the data become available for the community?
I don't think
http://www.komisigratis.net/?id=jokarwilis
Sent from my BlackBerry®
powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT
-Original Message-
From: Erik Moeller
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:35:19
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Cc: Ruediger Glott; Philipp
Schmidt
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] First data from
As I mentioned in my previous message, the Board of Trustees prepared a
statement at its meeting related to biographies of living people. It
touches on the major considerations in this issue, but also how this
relates to our fundamental objectives. The statement was unanimously
approved by the
17 matches
Mail list logo
