Florence Devouard wrote: > Someone asked me a question on the French wikipedia and to be fair, I am > not sure what to answer. > > The CURRENT text of the licencing proposition gives a link to > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ > > > Whilst the text of the resolution adopted in december 2007 > http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:License_update > Refers to > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ > > The second is the US one. Not the first. > > What are the implications ? And which one is *currently* proposed for > the relicensing scheme ? > > thanks > > Ant
By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by the change of licence ? With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the impact of the licence is higher than Wikimania scholarship. Ant _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
