Tim Starling wrote:
> On 09/08/10 03:17, James Alexander wrote:
>> Global locking does not have any autoblock like feature and we have a large
>> portion of our xwiki abusers (and even a growing number of those who only
>> attack only one or two sites and have figured out the global login system)
>
On 09/08/10 03:17, James Alexander wrote:
> Global locking does not have any autoblock like feature and we have a large
> portion of our xwiki abusers (and even a growing number of those who only
> attack only one or two sites and have figured out the global login system)
> who will take advantage
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Aaron Adrignola wrote:
> > I appreciate your detailed explanation. If a page at Meta could be
> created
> > to explain this and linked to from the edit summaries this would do much
> to
> > eliminate confusion amongst local administrators. I d
Aaron Adrignola wrote:
> I appreciate your detailed explanation. If a page at Meta could be created
> to explain this and linked to from the edit summaries this would do much to
> eliminate confusion amongst local administrators. I do have a concern,
> however. I've checked the SUL statuses for
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Aaron Adrignola
wrote:
> I appreciate your detailed explanation. If a page at Meta could be created
> to explain this and linked to from the edit summaries this would do much to
> eliminate confusion amongst local administrators. I do have a concern,
> however. I
I appreciate your detailed explanation. If a page at Meta could be created
to explain this and linked to from the edit summaries this would do much to
eliminate confusion amongst local administrators. I do have a concern,
however. I've checked the SUL statuses for many of these accounts blocked
While I've had my own issues with Stewards reaching into local communities I
actually think these blocks are important and very useful for our xwiki
abusers. While the transparency reasoning that Pathoschild mentioned is true
and important just as if not more important is the autoblocks (where at
l
Jesse (Pathoschild), 08/08/2010 16:53:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aaron Adrignola
> wrote:
>> It is irritating to continually see stewards making local blocks at the
>> English language Wikibooks with the comment "crosswiki abuse > locked[1]; about bot[2]-- >".
>
> These local blocks are m
That would be an acceptable solution. Thanks.
--User:Adrignola
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Jesse (Pathoschild)
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aaron Adrignola
> wrote:
> > It is irritating to continually see stewards making local blocks at the
> > English language Wikibooks with t
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aaron Adrignola
wrote:
> It is irritating to continually see stewards making local blocks at the
> English language Wikibooks with the comment "crosswiki abuse locked[1]; about bot[2]-- >".
These local blocks are made when the account has been globally locked
by a
It is irritating to continually see stewards making local blocks at the
English language Wikibooks with the comment "crosswiki abuse ". This has been occurring since March. In
every case I've checked the user in question has a unified account and in
nearly all cases they have not made any edits l
11 matches
Mail list logo
