Jesse (Pathoschild), 08/08/2010 16:53: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Aaron Adrignola > <[email protected]> wrote: >> It is irritating to continually see stewards making local blocks at the >> English language Wikibooks with the comment "crosswiki abuse <! --globally >> locked[1]; about bot[2]-- >". > > These local blocks are made when the account has been globally locked > by a steward (see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/SH#lock ). There can > be no further undermining of local community autonomy, because the > local account is blocked with or without an explicit local block. The > local blocks are implemented automatically as a way for local > communities to know the user is blocked, since there is no other local > indication of the implicit block.
I'm ok with those block, but if this is all you want, why isn't a short block enough? It would leave a trace in the local logs, although it wouldn't be displayed on [[Special:Contributions]]. Nemo _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
