--- On Thu, 5/21/09, private musings wrote:
>
- I'm particularly
> keen at the moment
> to try and discern whether or not it's possible to move
> forward in any way
> on this issue, or whether or not we're sort of stuck in the
> bed we've made
> to date all thoughts and ideas most welcome
+2
skype: node.ue
2009/5/22 David Gerard :
> 2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton :
>> 2009/5/22 private musings :
>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I saw this news item today;
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
>>> and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
>>> concerning sexual co
I concur. Getting an unsatisfactory response does not mean that you should
bang on about it incessantly.
- Chris
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton :
> > 2009/5/22 private musings :
>
> >> Hi all,
> >> I saw this news item today;
> >> http://news.bbc
2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/5/22 private musings :
>> Hi all,
>> I saw this news item today;
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
>> and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
>> concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this repl
2009/5/22 private musings :
> Hi all,
>
> I saw this news item today;
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
>
> and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
> concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this reply
> anywhoo (both the story
tinguished from the photograph.
From: private musings
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 7:50:09 PM
Subject: [Foundation-l] Proposals re : sexual content on wikimedia
Hi all,
I saw this news item today;
http://news.bbc.co.
Hi all,
I saw this news item today;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this list
concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this reply
anywhoo (both the story and the comments are worth reading, and I f
