I concur. Getting an unsatisfactory response does not mean that you should bang on about it incessantly.
- Chris On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>: > > 2009/5/22 private musings <thepmacco...@gmail.com>: > > >> Hi all, > >> I saw this news item today; > >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm > >> and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this > list > >> concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this > reply > >> anywhoo (both the story and the comments are worth reading, and I feel > they > >> deal with the 'baby' and 'bathwater' aspects reasonably well). > > > I think you've started enough threads here on this topic now. It is > > clear that the community doesn't agree with you; this isn't going > > anywhere. Please drop it. > > > +1 > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
