Hi everyone,
As you may be aware, we accepted with regret the resignation of one of the
members of the ombudsman commission. Herbythyme will be missed. However,
given the need to fill the seat, I asked for volunteers and received several
very promising candidates, so this seemed a very good time
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Philippe Beaudette
wrote:
> They will serve for a term of one year.
When does their term begin? If it's now then we need to ask a steward
to remove the old ones from the global group and add in the new ones,
but if it's not until later then we can wait. We also
Hi all,
As the month draws to a close, I wanted to announce this year's ombudsman
commission, and offer my thanks to those who have served on the commission for
the past year.
Outgoing commission members are:
Carkuni, of jawiki
DR, of ruwiki
Elian, of dewiki
Lar, of enwiki and commonswiki
Palna
2009/8/9 Peter Jacobi :
> The issue is still unresolved.
>
> de:User:Mautpreller, who filed the original complaint, just affirmed
> that there is still no answer.
>
> See
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:Checkuser/Anfragen#Ombudskommission
>
> So, just doing nothing may be a way
The issue is still unresolved.
de:User:Mautpreller, who filed the original complaint, just affirmed
that there is still no answer.
See
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:Checkuser/Anfragen#Ombudskommission
So, just doing nothing may be a way of telling de:User:Mautpreller
that hi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Casey Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Al Tally
> wrote:
> > I notice, for example, that the enwiki
> > based ombudsman, Sam Korn, has made just one edit this month. I think for
> a
> > role like this, it is necessary to be more active than that.
>
2009/7/28 Casey Brown :
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Al Tally wrote:
>> I notice, for example, that the enwiki
>> based ombudsman, Sam Korn, has made just one edit this month. I think for a
>> role like this, it is necessary to be more active than that.
>>
>
> I wouldn't necessarily define "a
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Al Tally wrote:
> I notice, for example, that the enwiki
> based ombudsman, Sam Korn, has made just one edit this month. I think for a
> role like this, it is necessary to be more active than that.
>
I wouldn't necessarily define "active" by edits in this role, but
This is strange - in times past, we have had only 3 ombudsmen at a time, and
now we have five. Are they all fairly active? Do they want to continue this
role? Have they all been contacted? I notice, for example, that the enwiki
based ombudsman, Sam Korn, has made just one edit this month. I think f
I hope those procedures are fixed with a high priority. Because privacy is a
serious issue, and users are referred to the ombudsmen committee often,
assuming that is fully functional if necessary. If it is not, that means a
lot more responsibility for the WMF, the stewards etc. Are the current
memb
2009/7/27 geni :
> 2009/7/26 effe iets anders :
>> Has this issue been resolved? I think it would be quite serious if the
>> committee is not functioning, so would like to get some confirmation here.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Lodewijk
>>
>
> Doesn't appear to be.
>
> --
> geni
>
> __
2009/7/26 effe iets anders :
> Has this issue been resolved? I think it would be quite serious if the
> committee is not functioning, so would like to get some confirmation here.
> Thanks.
>
> Lodewijk
>
Doesn't appear to be.
--
geni
___
foundation-l
Has this issue been resolved? I think it would be quite serious if the
committee is not functioning, so would like to get some confirmation here.
Thanks.
Lodewijk
2009/7/18 Peter Jacobi
> On dewiki there is a discussion whether the Ombudsman commission does
> fulfill its mission.
>
>
> http://d
On dewiki there is a discussion whether the Ombudsman commission does
fulfill its mission.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Diskussion:Checkuser/Anfragen#Ombudskommission
Some months ago there was a checkuser action which was questioned by
some users and the Ombudsman commission was asked t
Michael Snow wrote:
> Eia wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A few days ago, the term for the ombudsman commission expired.
>> Unfortunately, I missed an announcement about the commission for 2009. Could
>> someone clarify who will be the 2009 members, and where the announcement
>> (will be/is) made?
>>
Michael Snow writes:
> Rather, the point is that there's a sense the ombudsman commission,
> as currently constituted, has not been a fully satisfactory answer
> to the potential scope of issues. Now one reaction might simply be a
> change in personnel, but I think this is an appropriate point to
effe iets anders wrote:
> Hm, I always saw the ombudsman commission as a commission very different and
> seperate from the whole commission structure. If I recall correctly, it was
> mainly to fill a Real Gap, namely an option to file complaints for breach of
> privacy policy. I think this clearly
Nathan wrote:
> >From your comments, Michael, can we infer that you are considering making
> the monitoring and enforcement of the privacy policy, and the subpolicy
> [[m:checkuser]], a staff responsibility?
>
I suppose that's one possibility, but not one I was particularly focused
on. Mike God
Hm, I always saw the ombudsman commission as a commission very different and
seperate from the whole commission structure. If I recall correctly, it was
mainly to fill a Real Gap, namely an option to file complaints for breach of
privacy policy. I think this clearly defined mission is quite differe
>From your comments, Michael, can we infer that you are considering making
the monitoring and enforcement of the privacy policy, and the subpolicy
[[m:checkuser]], a staff responsibility?
Nathan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.
Eia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few days ago, the term for the ombudsman commission expired.
> Unfortunately, I missed an announcement about the commission for 2009. Could
> someone clarify who will be the 2009 members, and where the announcement
> (will be/is) made?
>
We're currently reevaluating th
Hi all,
A few days ago, the term for the ombudsman commission expired.
Unfortunately, I missed an announcement about the commission for 2009. Could
someone clarify who will be the 2009 members, and where the announcement
(will be/is) made?
Thanks,
Lodewijk
___
22 matches
Mail list logo
