Hm, I always saw the ombudsman commission as a commission very different and seperate from the whole commission structure. If I recall correctly, it was mainly to fill a Real Gap, namely an option to file complaints for breach of privacy policy. I think this clearly defined mission is quite different from for instance communication committee, special projects committee and chapters committee, which are much more vaguely defined, no clear purposes and with vague membership and authority to the outer world. As I saw and see it, is the ombudsman commission a replacement for a real ombudsman, a place to file complaints without having to go to court.
Therefore, I'd like to plea to remain this structure if there are no complaints about that as such, no matter what happens to the commission structure as a whole. Best regards, Lodewijk 2009/1/2 Michael Snow <wikipe...@verizon.net> > Eia wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A few days ago, the term for the ombudsman commission expired. > > Unfortunately, I missed an announcement about the commission for 2009. > Could > > someone clarify who will be the 2009 members, and where the announcement > > (will be/is) made? > > > We're currently reevaluating the ombudsman commission as part of a > larger rethinking of the committee system that was established some > years ago, before the foundation had much in the way of staff or > structure. This will be a significant topic in our board meeting next > week, and I hope we can provide more information after the meeting. > > In the meantime, if anyone would like to offer feedback, I would be very > happy to hear it. In particular, ideas or suggestions on what our needs > are and how best to satisfy them. I'm less interested in random > complaints about this or that committee, I think we're already aware of > most of the concerns that have been raised, although anyone who thinks > they know of a problem nobody has ever mentioned before is welcome to > contact me off-list. I'm more interested in analysis of how our > committees work, what their strengths and limitations are, what can be > reasonably expected of them, and how we should fill in the gaps. > > --Michael Snow > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
