Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Adam Cuerden wrote:
>
>> With respect, the work on the Sexual Content proposal as pretty much
>> thrown out all of Jimbo's work, and is proceeding from a direction
>>
> [snip]
>
> You're linking to something from May 17th. It would
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Adam Cuerden wrote:
> With respect, the work on the Sexual Content proposal as pretty much
> thrown out all of Jimbo's work, and is proceeding from a direction
[snip]
You're linking to something from May 17th. It would be much more
productive to focus on matters w
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2010/clarifying-recent-coverage-of-wikipedia/
With respect, the work on the Sexual Content proposal as pretty much
thrown out all of Jimbo's work, and is proceeding from a direction
more consistent with the values of Commons. To say that " Jimmy is
actively engaged in di
