http://blog.wikimedia.org/2010/clarifying-recent-coverage-of-wikipedia/
With respect, the work on the Sexual Content proposal as pretty much thrown out all of Jimbo's work, and is proceeding from a direction more consistent with the values of Commons. To say that " Jimmy is actively engaged in discussions with other Wikimedia editors about sexually-explicit materials on Wikimedia Commons." is highly misleading: He has not been involved with this process since the attempted purge. Further: "and although the discussions over the past week have been unusually intense, we don’t consider them problematic. Discussion is how Wikimedians work through policy development and policy interpretation: active argument and debate are normal for us — they are how we do our work. The Wikimedia Foundation is grateful for Jimmy’s involvement, and we’re glad he continues to be an important part of the Wikimedia movement." Actually, Jimbo was highly disruptive, edit-warred to force artworks to be included in the list of material to delete, threatened people, and no progress was or could be made until he left it to us volunteers. -Adam _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
