I think he was joking. I got a pretty nice laugh out of that.
skype: node.ue
2009/4/23 Sebastian Moleski :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Dalton
> wrote:
...The WMF has
always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
cater to the laws of every count
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> ...The WMF has
>>> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
>>> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
>>> Germany
>>
>> {{citation needed}}
>
> What do want a citation for, the WMF statemen
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:51 AM, wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 07:51:27 GMT, David Gerard wrote:
> >
> http://newteevee.com/2009/04/20/achtung-youtube-germany-proposes-federal-id-checks-for-online-video-sites/
> >
> > German readers - how much of a danger is this? Is Commons enough of a
> "
2009/4/23 Sebastian Moleski :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Thomas Dalton
> wrote:
>> ... The WMF has
>> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
>> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
>> Germany
> {{citation needed}}
The same reason w
2009/4/23 David Gerard :
> 2009/4/23 Thomas Dalton :
>
>> Commons isn't a German site, so I don't see a problem. The WMF has
>> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
>> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
>> Germany. The article mentions a pla
2009/4/23 Thomas Dalton :
> Commons isn't a German site, so I don't see a problem. The WMF has
> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
> Germany. The article mentions a plan to force German ISPs to block
2009/4/23 Sebastian Moleski :
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Thomas Dalton
> wrote:
>> ... The WMF has
>> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
>> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
>> Germany
>
> {{citation needed}}
What do want a cit
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> ... The WMF has
> always said that it intends to follow US law only and not try and
> cater to the laws of every country in the world - that includes
> Germany
{{citation needed}}
Sebastian
___
f
2009/4/23 David Gerard :
> http://newteevee.com/2009/04/20/achtung-youtube-germany-proposes-federal-id-checks-for-online-video-sites/
>
> German readers - how much of a danger is this? Is Commons enough of a
> "video site"?
Commons isn't a German site, so I don't see a problem. The WMF has
always
I would guess probably not. Then again I am not German and have no legal
training in the Basic Code.
From: David Gerard
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:51:27 AM
Subject: [Foundation-l] ID requirements proposed for
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 07:51:27 GMT, David Gerard wrote:
> http://newteevee.com/2009/04/20/achtung-youtube-germany-proposes-federal-id-checks-for-online-video-sites/
>
> German readers - how much of a danger is this? Is Commons enough of a
"video site"?
>
> - d.
Not much. It is just a campaign o
http://newteevee.com/2009/04/20/achtung-youtube-germany-proposes-federal-id-checks-for-online-video-sites/
German readers - how much of a danger is this? Is Commons enough of a
"video site"?
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikime
12 matches
Mail list logo
