I am so glad that as soon as someone pops up with some text when asked for
it, that the positive reactions are so overwhelming :) Anyway, the
translation has been proofread, feel free to use etc as explained.
Lodewijk
2008/11/16 effe iets anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for shari
It doesn't really matter what was on their mind, even though I also disagree
on what is on their mind. It matters that the discussion has been broken
open, and that it will be on the agenda of the commission and after that the
parliament. If it is on the agenda, it is time for a little lobby and tr
nonsense. There are (small list):
* Creative Commons, dozens of chapters
* Wikimedia, several chapters
* Free Knowledge institute
* Open Office
* Several Linux organisations
* Actually *any* organisation that makes on a large scale freely licensed
manuals etc
* Open Streetmap
* Several libraries (
Hi all,
Thanks for sharing this. Wikimedia Nederland is working on a reaction which
has been draft-translated into English as well. We were invited by the Dutch
ministry of legal affairs to give our view on this green paper, to be taken
into account for the national government reaction. We have do
2008/11/15 Gerard Meijssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hoi,
> When the EU develops a law that deals with copyright and licensing, it will
> implicitly include "Free" licenses.
EU backed laws have tended towards incidental hostility to free licenses.
>It is exactly for this reason that
> communities li
Hoi,
When the EU develops a law that deals with copyright and licensing, it will
implicitly include "Free" licenses. It is exactly for this reason that
communities like ours who have at least an idea of what we consider to be
the right way forward are asked to step on the plate. When we, as a
commu
2008/11/15 Michael Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14 Nov 2008, at 15:47, geni wrote:
>
>> 2008/11/14 teun spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Agree.
>>>
>>> And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses
>>> could be
>>> informed?
>>
>>
>> There is nothing in there of any real signif
On 14 Nov 2008, at 15:47, geni wrote:
> 2008/11/14 teun spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Agree.
>>
>> And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses
>> could be
>> informed?
>
>
> There is nothing in there of any real significance to free licenses.
Isn't that something that shou
Teofilo, 14/11/2008 16:20:
> The European Commission published in July a "Green Paper - Copyright
> in the Knowledge Economy" (1) .
http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Groep_Groenboek/en
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsub
2008/11/14 teun spaans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Agree.
>
> And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses could be
> informed?
There is nothing in there of any real significance to free licenses.
--
geni
___
foundation-l mailing list
f
2008/11/14 Teofilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The European Commission published in July a "Green Paper - Copyright
> in the Knowledge Economy" (1) .
>
> In §3.4. They talk about the possibility to adapt copyright law so
> that user-created contents would become easier,
Not really. They want to produce
Agree.
And perhaps other organizations working with copy left licenses could be
informed?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Teofilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The European Commission published in July a "Green Paper - Copyright
> in the Knowledge Economy" (1) .
>
> In §3.4. They talk about th
The European Commission published in July a "Green Paper - Copyright
in the Knowledge Economy" (1) .
In §3.4. They talk about the possibility to adapt copyright law so
that user-created contents would become easier, and they ask to send
them feedback by 30 November 2008 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I t
13 matches
Mail list logo
