upposed to remove the well-known barriers to editing
Wikipedia? Survey doesn't contain these practical answers, we have to try
solutions ourselves. Very little has been done so far.
In other words, what does this survey aims to achieve that it's predecessors
did not?
Yours, Rodan Bury
//wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings> a few developers
they've been needing badly for a long time. But they don't seem to get the
employees they need, and that's becoming a serious concern.
Rodan Bury
___
foundation-l mailing list
found
e Wikimedia Foundation's fault for not
carrying on the Usability Initiative.
As for the bugs you point out
(20919<https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20919>and
22801 <https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22801>) they are now
the resp
ployed soon. This will
provide significant results in the number of uploads at commons for sure.
Rodan Bury
2011/4/2 Ray Saintonge
> On 04/01/11 8:29 AM, Sarah wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 09:10, David Gerard wrote:
> >> I've been using it on our work intranet for new
té soulevée seulement il ya quelques jours, et
la discussion avec Linterweb n'a pas encore commencé. Il n'est pas
nécessaire de précipiter les choses.
Dodoïste / Rodan Bury
2011/1/25 Teofilo
> Aren't we going to throw these "partnerships" (?) away ? If Wikimedi
Le 21 janvier 2011 23:06, Ashar Voultoiz
> a écrit :
> Il y a des outils permettant de filtrer les contenus gênants (POV) pour
> les enfants / ados. Je ne connais que FreeAngel de Free :
>
> http://www.free.fr/adsl/pages/informations-legales/protection-de-l-enfance/free-angel.html
>
> Concernant
Thanks for the quick reply. :-)
Le 12 novembre 2010 21:17, Frédéric Schütz a écrit :
> Bank check ? This is not a bank check. What is suggested is that people
> should make an online donation using ebanking.
>
> Now, for the record, this was a specific request from the Swiss chapter.
> Last year
appreciated.
2. There must be an explicit and obvious way to donate online, via a
credit card or Paypal.
3. Let the user choose if he wants to donate to the local chapter, or the
WMF. Both should be as obvious, and one option should not be voluntarily set
aside.
Kind regards,
and was not intended.
So Teofilo should definitely fill in a bug report about it.
Kind regards, Rodan Bury / Dodoïste
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
A dump "once a year or so" is not enough: the average life span of a website
is 3 months. Kind regards, Dodoïste
2010/8/31 Ryan Kaldari
> A real-time feed of external links is overkill. As mentioned by others,
> the chief problem is linkrot of old links. All we need to do is dump the
> contents
2010/8/24
> Nikola Smolenski wrote:
> >
> > I wanted to suggest this for a long time. I see two more reasons for
> this:
> >
> > - We are often copying free images or text from various sites (for
> > example flickr but other ones too). It happens that these sites go
> > offline or change their li
Google's cache only last a handful of days. It's very useful if the Website
is down temporarily (for maintenance or overload for example) but totally
useless otherwise.
Kind Regards, Dodoïste
2010/8/24 theo10011
> Its a great idea, using the wayback machine to ward of link rot. I support
> it b
12 matches
Mail list logo
