2010/8/24 <wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk> > Nikola Smolenski wrote: > > > > I wanted to suggest this for a long time. I see two more reasons for > this: > > > > - We are often copying free images or text from various sites (for > > example flickr but other ones too). It happens that these sites go > > offline or change their licenses later. Having such an archive, archived > > by an independent organization, would be indisputable proof of copyright > > status.
> The internet archive [...] respects copyright and robots.txt and applies > the > directives retroactively. > And so does Wikiwix. Wikiwix do respect robots.txt. Linterweb's advocate certified there is no legal issue with Wikiwix. Regards, Dodoïste _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
