Alert dismissed!
I found I can access Wikipedia again this noon time.
>From morning to noon, this block only last several hours. I don't know the
exact reason for this.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:43 AM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Mingli Yuan wrote:
> > Hi, folks,
> >
In nothing more then unscientific 'hand my laptop over to a friend, wait,
switch themes, wait, ask opinions', repeated with 11 guinea pigs (i mean
friends), it came out a wash. After 15 minutes in each theme, it was close
to a split. 7 said they preferred monobook, 4 vector. When asked to compare
v
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Mingli Yuan wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> When I browsed Wikipedia this morning, I found all wikimedia sites were
> blocked again in China.
> And several others reported blocking by their ISP also.
>
> Recently Ai WeiWei, a famous artist and activist, were detained by the
Hi, folks,
When I browsed Wikipedia this morning, I found all wikimedia sites were
blocked again in China.
And several others reported blocking by their ISP also.
Recently Ai WeiWei, a famous artist and activist, were detained by the
government,
it seems that the government seized their control o
Machado initiated this matter by posting a sarcastic message directed at
me to the effect that I was ignorant.
I'm sorry if someone has overdone it in responding to him, but the
ugliness started with him.
Fred Bauder
> After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
> reflection, it i
Jan Kucera (Kozuch) wrote:
> why is the Foundation so passive??? I have been since almost 5 years with
> various Wikimedia projects and I can really see NO PROGRESS from the side of
> the Foundation but more employees, 2 new blogs, new Vector skin and maybe
> MediaWiki performance tweaks. My partic
Andrew was clearly referring to me, lets leave him out of this please.
-Dan
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
> reflection, it is my conviction that the posts of two above mentioned
> editors should be moderate
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado
> wrote:
>> Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, "Your messages are
>> deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to boot."
Andrew was sticking up for you, Virgilio, not addressing that comment
at you, so that part of
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, "Your messages are
> deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to boot." it is
> unclear what messages he is referring to, but these are not
> acceptable terms to classify any
Oh dear. In the hurly-burly of Wikipedia especially, trenchant, even strong,
language seems to be accepted from some but not from others. Some give and
take should be allowed but when a top 100 contributor is desysopped for
little else by WP's ArbCom, who knows where the limits may be? This is a
After a cool off period of about 48 hours and considerable
reflection, it is my conviction that the posts of two above mentioned
editors should be moderated from now on.
Andrew Garrett wrote, Sun Apr 3 10:13:26 UTC 2011, "Your messages are
deliberately obnoxious, unpleasant, and off-topic to bo
News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-04-04/News_and_notes
In the news: Academic contributions; Jimmy Wales weighs in on murder
trial controversy; brief news
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiped
2011/4/4 Amir E. Aharoni :
> For example, in the Hebrew Wikipedia there was a Search and Replace
> gadget long before the advent of Vector's Search and Replace dialog.
> It was developed due to popular demand, bottom-up, by a volunteer, and
> - here's the scariest part - without any grants. It is s
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 22:14, Erik Moeller wrote:
> 2011/4/4 Rodan Bury :
>> As Erik Möller said the qualitative analysis is the user testing with a few
>> dozens of users. This user testing was conducted several times during the
>> development cycle, and it was thorough. The best user testing con
2011/4/4 Rodan Bury :
> As Erik Möller said the qualitative analysis is the user testing with a few
> dozens of users. This user testing was conducted several times during the
> development cycle, and it was thorough. The best user testing consist of no
> more than 30 users, and I can tell the user
2011/4/4 Amir E. Aharoni
> 2011/4/4 David Gerard
> >
> > On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni
> wrote:
> >
> > > I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
> > > the deployment of Vector did cost some money and also forced a lot of
> > > volunteers in English and i
On 4 April 2011 17:20, FT2 wrote:
> I'm not seeing discussion of "chronically broken" code there. Just
> discussion of redundant code (due to 1.17) and cleanup. Any chance of a
> pointer to something that sums up the "chronically broken" nature of site
> script?
e.g.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/
I'm not seeing discussion of "chronically broken" code there. Just
discussion of redundant code (due to 1.17) and cleanup. Any chance of a
pointer to something that sums up the "chronically broken" nature of site
script?
FT2
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:41 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 4 April 2011
2011/4/4 David Gerard
>
> On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
>
> > I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
> > the deployment of Vector did cost some money and also forced a lot of
> > volunteers in English and in all other language projects to make
> > a
On 4 April 2011 16:33, FT2 wrote:
> Thread title?
"Focus on sister projects". Lots of the archive page as of today:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2011-April/
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Uns
Thread title?
FT2
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> See the current thread on wikitech-l about how chronically broken
> most site JavaScript is and what to do about the problem
>
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wi
On 4 April 2011 16:20, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
> I understand that WMF's resources are limited, but the development and
> the deployment of Vector did cost some money and also forced a lot of
> volunteers in English and in all other language projects to make
> adjustments to their sites. Measuring
2011/4/2 Rodan Bury :
> The analysis of the qualitative and quantitative results of the Usability
> Initiative is not a question anybody can answer. Comments like "I personally
> prefer monobook" (fictional example) does not help to make an analysis based
> on facts.
>
> Erik Möller's answer is pro
23 matches
Mail list logo
