For anyone interested who hasn't already seen it, here's a link to Judge
Chin's opinion rejecting the proposed settlement in the Google Books case:
http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=115
Newyorkbrad
___
foundation-l mailing list
f
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> I doubt there is any way the court in question can enforce its ruling,
> which is probably why the WMF didn't bother responding.
subscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I am sort of curious as to what the substa
On 25 March 2011 17:55, Fred Bauder wrote:
>> I doubt there is any way the court in question can enforce its ruling,
>> which is probably why the WMF didn't bother responding.
>
> For all we know we have servers in Hong Kong.
I think we know where we have servers...
_
> For all we know we have servers in Hong Kong.
not that I'm aware of :)
Domas
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> I doubt there is any way the court in question can enforce its ruling,
> which is probably why the WMF didn't bother responding.
For all we know we have servers in Hong Kong. This stuff can bite if
someone is clever and aggressive enough; default judgments can be a
nightmare; ever hear of "sewer
I doubt there is any way the court in question can enforce its ruling,
which is probably why the WMF didn't bother responding.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/founda
The Oriental Press Group in Hong Kong prosecution the Wikimedia Foundation, see
the news in their newspaper.
*Translate by Google*
Based in the United States in the online encyclopedia "Wikipedia", was revealed
in the last published article in the Oriental Press Group defamation. Oriental
Press
We had a somewhat similar problem recently in the Portuguese Wikipedia with
a user page paroding several users (especially administrators), that was
formatted as a blog[1][2]. Even though we have a clear policy in respect to
the use of user pages, [3][4] deletion was only possible after a second
no
BTW, if the point is to conclude discussion in such state, you could
delegate any person outside community to do the job.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:33, Strainu wrote:
> I personally enjoy the independence that each project has in the
> Wikimedia universe. Therefore, I've given much thought on wether I
> should write this email. Bun in the situation I will present below, I
> really don't know what more can be done a
Hi,
I personally enjoy the independence that each project has in the
Wikimedia universe. Therefore, I've given much thought on wether I
should write this email. Bun in the situation I will present below, I
really don't know what more can be done according to the current
policies in effect on my h
The movement roles working group met again yesterday, and the main
meta pages are being updated as a result. One point of note -- Sue
recently shared her long-form answers to some questions about the
process (thank you!), which are worth reading:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
