> I think I'd rather a more pedestrian solution of something with a big
> fat TEN YEARS or 10TH ANNIVERSARY on it.
>
> And make it clickable through to a celebration page if clicked on when
> already on the home page, maybe?
>
> Basically, few will know what the old logo represents. I don't even
Chinese Wikipedia is just planning for change the logo in the mid January.
Discussion is going on in VP, and the logo is
http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/File:10piece-chinese-L_k_2.svg . Chinese
Wikipedia
is also using JavaScript on common.js to use the logo stored in local but not
commons.
Some
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back for
> one day to those old logo's? Give people a retro feeling? (would love to see
> enwiki go back to the american flag, but perhaps the round text logo would
> lead
Wikipedia was started on that date, wasn't it? True, other Wikipedias
didn't exist yet, but I don't think that makes it any less
significant. If you speak a non-English language as your native tongue
and wish therefore to not make any fuss about the date, feel free, but
I'm certain it won't just be
Steven Walling wrote:
> "The other Wikipedias weren't started on that date, so they have nothing to
> celebrate or commemorate."
>
> The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
> English Wikipedia's celebration, there certainly wouldn't be more than 100
> events organized
On 6 January 2011 00:56, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> It may be a bit late to ship t-shirts to Antarctica and, they are likely to
> be not warm enough.
We're talking about the finest mad scientists of the modern era.
No-one goes to Antarctica without being a genuine paid-up mad
scientist and proud
Hoi,
It may be a bit late to ship t-shirts to Antarctica and, they are likely to
be not warm enough.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 6 January 2011 01:52, David Gerard wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 00:45, Steven Walling wrote:
>
> > The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
>
On 6 January 2011 00:45, Steven Walling wrote:
> The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
> English Wikipedia's celebration, there certainly wouldn't be more than 100
> events organized in dozens of countries and on every continent except
> Antarctica.
And just WHY
"The other Wikipedias weren't started on that date, so they have nothing to
celebrate or commemorate."
The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
English Wikipedia's celebration, there certainly wouldn't be more than 100
events organized in dozens of countries and on eve
Changing it on one date doesn't exclude changing it again on another. I dont
know if that is a common concept around the world, but if I can find an
excuse to party twice for the same thing, I want to do that!
Lodewijk
2011/1/6 MZMcBride
> Lodewijk wrote:
> > wouldn't it be nice to change the l
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Lodewijk wrote:
> wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back for
> one day to those old logo's?
I think I'd rather a more pedestrian solution of something with a big
fat TEN YEARS or 10TH ANNIVERSARY on it.
And make it clickable thr
There's always CSS.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:24 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Lodewijk wrote:
> > wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back
> for
> > one day to those old logo's? Give people a retro feeling? (would love to
> see
> > enwiki go back to the american flag, bu
Lodewijk wrote:
> wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back for
> one day to those old logo's? Give people a retro feeling? (would love to see
> enwiki go back to the american flag, but perhaps the round text logo would
> lead to less overload of the OTRS queues) How
or the wikix logo
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Lodewijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back
> for
> one day to those old logo's? Give people a retro feeling? (would love to
> see
> enwiki go back to the american flag, but perhaps the round
Hi,
wouldn't it be nice to change the logo of Wikipedia on January 15th back for
one day to those old logo's? Give people a retro feeling? (would love to see
enwiki go back to the american flag, but perhaps the round text logo would
lead to less overload of the OTRS queues) How can these logo's be
On 5 January 2011 21:51, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> Is this supposed to be funny?
> Time to address this matter to the list moderators.
I would say that posting about an RFA on Meta is not specifically
off-topic for here, but I wouldn't like it to happen for *every* RFA.
It is entirely to
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
> Is this supposed to be funny?
>
> Time to address this matter to the list moderators.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Virgilio A. P. Machado
Neither of these was funny; both were backhanded insults to you.
That said - I am not sure what role yo
Is this supposed to be funny?
Time to address this matter to the list moderators.
Sincerely,
Virgilio A. P. Machado
On Wed, January 5, 2011 8:31 pm, Huib Laurens wrote:
> Thnks for posting that Peter is running for admin... Will support right
> away.
>
> Huib
>
> 2011/1/5 M. Williamson
>
>> V
What does your answer has to do with my request for assistance? As far as
I'm concerned you are more then welcome to vote for whomever you want and
any way you want. It's none of my business or the business of any of this
list members. There seems to be some abuse of your privileges as a member
of
Sra. Lima, em facto senhorita Lima. XD
But your portuguese is almost perfect.
_
*Béria Lima (Beh)
(351) 925 171 484*
2011/1/5 M. Williamson
> Muito obrigado Sr. Lima, peço desculpas pelo meu "portunhol".
>
> Hope this new year is a good one for you and everybody else.
>
> -m
>
> 2011/1/5 B
Muito obrigado Sr. Lima, peço desculpas pelo meu "portunhol".
Hope this new year is a good one for you and everybody else.
-m
2011/1/5 Béria Lima :
> Correction in your portuguese phrase:
>
> "Depois de avaliar a*s* evidência*s* apresentada*s*, votei a favor da
> proposta d*e* concessão de poder
Correction in your portuguese phrase:
"Depois de avaliar a*s* evidência*s* apresentada*s*, votei a favor da
proposta d*e* concessão de poderes administrativos a Peter Symonds *no*Meta."
*Béria Lima (Beh)
*
2011/1/5 M. Williamson
> Virgilio:
>
> Many thanks for the information. I have, aft
Thnks for posting that Peter is running for admin... Will support right
away.
Huib
2011/1/5 M. Williamson
> Virgilio:
>
> Many thanks for the information. I have, after reviewing the evidence
> you presented, casted my vote in support of Peter Symonds' adminship
> on Meta.
>
> Muito obrigado pe
Virgilio:
Many thanks for the information. I have, after reviewing the evidence
you presented, casted my vote in support of Peter Symonds' adminship
on Meta.
Muito obrigado pela informação. Depois de avaliar a evidência
apresentada, votei a favor da proposta da concessão de poderes
administrativo
Thanks for the pointer. +1 for PeterSymonds.
~Nathan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Theo,
I don't know why you are seeing an indeterminedly old version, you may try
to clean up your cache (=purge in the web address of your browser).
May be I didn't make myself clear enough: Flagged Revvs doesn't require to
wait for anything, you can only see the patrolling interface because you a
To all women and men of good faith who are members of this mailing list,
please check the following pages:
1) http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_adminship/PeterSymonds
2)
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta_talk:Requests_for_adminship/PeterSymonds
3)
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/
2011/1/5 Kropotkine_113 :
> Le mercredi 05 janvier 2011 à 18:31 +0200, Teofilo a écrit :
>> I think this is what Wikimedia is looking
>> like with the so-called "flagged revisions" software : the USSR.
>
>
> J'hésite entre rire et pleurer mais, là, tu as atteint un véritable
> sommet.
>
> Je ne te
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2011 à 18:31 +0200, Teofilo a écrit :
> I think this is what Wikimedia is looking
> like with the so-called "flagged revisions" software : the USSR.
J'hésite entre rire et pleurer mais, là, tu as atteint un véritable
sommet.
Je ne te comprends pas. Tu es de façon évident
2011/1/4, Виктория :
> it had been patrolled = [отпатрулированная версия] anyway.
What about the message "Стабильная версия была проверена 28 сентября
2010. 1 изменение ожидает проверки." which is written now at the top
of the history tab (1), and google-translates into English as "Stable
version
2011/1/5, Tim Starling :
> On 05/01/11 00:33, Teofilo wrote:
>> We are more or less 24 hours (19 hours, exactly) after I corrected the
>> mistake, but the toolserver.org/~kolossos/openlayers is still wrong.
>> This is not what a wiki is supposed to be.
>
> You seem to be getting confused between a
2011/1/4, Виктория :
> it had been patrolled = [отпатрулированная версия] anyway.
Thanks!
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
2011/1/5, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Their own editor still appears to be under active development at this
> point. I didn't see any pointers to either a code repository or a demo
> yet.
Yes, this is correct. The status is in development. Releasedata
estimated Cebit 2011.
*
http://www.wiki4enterpris
33 matches
Mail list logo
