On 5 January 2011 21:51, Virgilio A. P. Machado <v...@fct.unl.pt> wrote:
> Is this supposed to be funny? > Time to address this matter to the list moderators. I would say that posting about an RFA on Meta is not specifically off-topic for here, but I wouldn't like it to happen for *every* RFA. It is entirely to your credit that, in posting the link to the RFA, you did not suggest voting in any particular manner. I'm not sure it's a good idea for others to post their support for Peter's admin nomination - merely on the basis of assuming that any given style of posting will be duplicated until it's a bad idea - but I think it's excusable as all of the people doing so do know how to moderate their enthusiasm. I would suggest Meta RFAs not be brought up on foundation-l in general, but I would trust in the good sense of contributors (there may, after all, be a case in which doing so is a good idea) rather than making a rule as such. I do not question your sincerity in posting here. I do think you have no understanding whatsoever of how Wikimedia works, in detail or broad overview, but that's quite different from questioning your sincerity in any way. I see no reason not to assume good faith. An actual troll would have given up long ago. - d. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
