Дана Saturday 25 September 2010 17:53:05 Milos Rancic написа:
> So, I wanted to do that as I treat that as my responsibility. I filled
> the form once again and I had to spend next ~15 minutes while trying
> to upload the 20k logo: license is not correct, author is not correct,
> this is not correc
Hoi,
Please leave the experts alone, in their expert opinion Wikipedia is
impossible. In my observation Wikipedia does really well in attracting
people to read what we provide. So much so that Wikipedia is one of the
biggest websites in the world. Obviously that is not how the reality of our
succes
>
> I would however suggest that a good psychological profile question might
> be, "Have you ever worked on a government contract before?"
>
> W
>
Early on, I was in the Navy. Ignore all rules is enshrined in "There is
the right way, the wrong way, and the Navy way" which tells you to get it
done
In a message dated 9/25/2010 12:10:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
fredb...@fairpoint.net writes:
> Yes, it's hard to collaborate; that's why Wikipedia is considered
> impossible by experts. >>
==
Hmm broad brush. I would say collaboration is considered hopeless to those
who thi
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 18:49, Marcus Buck wrote:
> Okay. Could you elaborate on that? What do you think should be changed?
> Which requirements are not well defined?
>
> So far I don't understand where exactly you see the influence of "bad
> bureaucracy" playing a role here.
Around a year ago:
*
> If I understood well, Americans don't have such bad feelings toward
> the word "bureaucracy" and its derivatives.
Wrong, the study of bureaucracy is considered by Americans to be a branch
of entomology, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_studies
Yes, it's hard to collaborate; that
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 19:47, Jim Redmond wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:35, Milos Rancic wrote:
>> Thanks for making it clear :) It seemed to me that there is less
>> antagonism toward bureaucracy among Americans.
>
> Clearly, you have not had to sit through any of our political rhetoric,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:35, Milos Rancic wrote:
> Thanks for making it clear :) It seemed to me that there is less
> antagonism toward bureaucracy among Americans.
>
Clearly, you have not had to sit through any of our political rhetoric,
which saves a special sort of venom for the phrase "Was
An'n 25.09.2010 18:32, hett Milos Rancic schreven:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 18:28, Marcus Buck wrote:
>> An'n 25.09.2010 17:53, hett Milos Rancic schreven:
>>> Today I am working from my netbook. It is not so easy to find the
>>> right button and the screen is small. I wanted to upload 20k lo
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 18:31, Michael Snow wrote:
> While I support the idea that we should have a discussion about how to
> manage and structure our bureaucratic elements, I think the distinction
> posited between American and European perspectives is imaginary. As an
> example, personally I ha
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 18:28, Marcus Buck wrote:
> An'n 25.09.2010 17:53, hett Milos Rancic schreven:
>> Today I am working from my netbook. It is not so easy to find the
>> right button and the screen is small. I wanted to upload 20k logo for
>> new Wikipedia edition (in Banjar) [1]. I wanted t
While I support the idea that we should have a discussion about how to
manage and structure our bureaucratic elements, I think the distinction
posited between American and European perspectives is imaginary. As an
example, personally I have so far declined to accept "bureaucrat" status
largel
An'n 25.09.2010 17:53, hett Milos Rancic schreven:
> Today I am working from my netbook. It is not so easy to find the
> right button and the screen is small. I wanted to upload 20k logo for
> new Wikipedia edition (in Banjar) [1]. I wanted to find the right
> copyright tag (logo is trademark of
If I understood well, Americans don't have such bad feelings toward
the word "bureaucracy" and its derivatives. In Europe it is different.
When I tell to Gerard that he is better bureaucrat than me, he feels
offended; although I thought about specific virtues, not defects; and
although I've defined
14 matches
Mail list logo
