This is would be very interesting but usefulness will be a bit limited
because people use Google to search instead of Wikipedia. Probably we will
get a list of read links clicked by readers they don’t know there is not an
article yet.
A complementary approach could be having a list of most viewe
I agree
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Philippe Beaudette <
pbeaude...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
>
> > This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the
> > top-posting perverts (sorry, but I do think you are in
> > the minority
On Jun 13, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the
> top-posting perverts (sorry, but I do think you are in
> the minority on this issue), on the list.
I object to this language, and strongly. "Top posting perverts"? And
we w
On 13 June 2010 23:33, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>
>> "Dog" isn't strongly associated in the public psyche with a particular
>> brand. "Wiki" is. Like I say, these are complicated issues of legal
>> interpretation and really should be left to the lawyers.
>>
>>
>>
> If t
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> "Dog" isn't strongly associated in the public psyche with a particular
> brand. "Wiki" is. Like I say, these are complicated issues of legal
> interpretation and really should be left to the lawyers.
>
What's relevant is that the WMF doe
Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> "Dog" isn't strongly associated in the public psyche with a particular
> brand. "Wiki" is. Like I say, these are complicated issues of legal
> interpretation and really should be left to the lawyers.
>
>
>
If there is any party with dibs on "Wiki", that would
be Ward Cun
On 13 June 2010 22:28, Platonides wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> On 13 June 2010 19:04, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
>>> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>>
>>> But that's most likely not a trademark issue. There are doz-
>>> ens of cola brands on the market and few feature extracts of
>>> the kola nut, but th
Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 13 June 2010 19:04, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
>> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>
>> But that's most likely not a trademark issue. There are doz-
>> ens of cola brands on the market and few feature extracts of
>> the kola nut, but that doesn't mean that it is Coca-Cola's
>> right or
On 13 June 2010 19:04, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
You are aware of [[en:Wiki]] for a history of wikis and
WMF's part in it?
>
>>> In other words, the use of "wiki" predates wikipedia (wikipedia gets
>>> its name since it was a encyclopedia using the wiki system)
>
>
Thomas Dalton wrote:
>
> I think everyone in this conversation is aware of that. Jiri said they
> were calling it "Wiki" despite it not actually being a wiki, which
> strongly suggests they are trying to associate it with Wikipedia
> (which is very commonly abbreviated to "Wiki" despite our attemp
Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> You are aware of [[en:Wiki]] for a history of wikis and
>>> WMF's part in it?
>> In other words, the use of "wiki" predates wikipedia (wikipedia gets
>> its name since it was a encyclopedia using the wiki system)
> I think everyone in this conversation is aware of that.
On 13 June 2010 17:22, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> In other words, the use of "wiki" predates wikipedia (wikipedia gets
> its name since it was a encyclopedia using the wiki system)
(speaking only personally) The consistent WMF position has been that
"Wikipedia" is a proper name and a trademark - bu
On 13 June 2010 17:22, Pedro Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tim Landscheidt
> wrote:
>> Jiří Hofman wrote:
>>
>>
>> You are aware of [[en:Wiki]] for a history of wikis and
>> WMF's part in it?
>>
>> Tim
>>
>
> In other words, the use of "wiki" predates wikipedia (wikipedia ge
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tim Landscheidt
wrote:
> Jiří Hofman wrote:
>
>
> You are aware of [[en:Wiki]] for a history of wikis and
> WMF's part in it?
>
> Tim
>
In other words, the use of "wiki" predates wikipedia (wikipedia gets
its name since it was a encyclopedia using the wiki syste
Jiří Hofman wrote:
> One of the Czech online news services, Aktuálně.cz ( http://aktualne.cz ) has
> launched its own encyclopedia a few weeks ago. Links to the encyclopedia's
> articles are used in news articles on this server. That would not be anything
> strange if the encyclopedia wasn't n
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Chad wrote:
> On behalf of everyone else on the list, please allow me
> to thank you for bringing up this useless argument for
> the Nth time on this list. Bravo, truly.
>
Actually, I think Jussi-Ville's comment was very useful -- I
frequently have no idea exactl
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
wrote:
> This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the
> top-posting perverts (sorry, but I do think you are in
> the minority on this issue), on the list.
>
> [more ranting of the same]
>
On behalf of everyone else on the list, pl
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> This is not a problem. We use the numbers that we have. We could ask Google
> for such numbers.. They might even be willing to share them with us.
> Thanks,
>GerardM
>
This is not only directed at you Gerard, but to all the
top-posting perverts (sorry, bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
