On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Gray wrote:
> presumably, it gets a little tighter right before the fundraisers.
>
In 2009 it was "tightest" end of september/beginning of october. In October
and November, revenues exceeded expenses.
That's a great chart (*) by the way. I'd be interested
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Anthony wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Chad wrote:
>
>> I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
>> en.wikipedia to "simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
>> use it" until the proposed enwiki changes a
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Chad wrote:
> I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
> en.wikipedia to "simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
> use it" until the proposed enwiki changes are ready.
>
Is it even technically feasible? Turn on
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
wrote:
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
>> Dan Rosenthal wrote:
>>> You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
>>> easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
>>> EFF is probably gettin
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Dan Rosenthal wrote:
>> You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
>> easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
>> EFF is probably getting involved over). However, the proper response to that
>> is for the
William Pietri wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 10:57 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
>
>> Purely as a point of fact it is simply inaccurate that the
>> 20 implementations of flagged revs and patrolled edits
>> across the other wikies than English Wikipedia are
>> monolithically identical. I know this fi
On 03/04/2010 01:45 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote:
> Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of
> flagged revisions taken seriously?
>
> This has been one of the main complaints about the implementation since
> day zero. All other complaints I've heard have been regarding the idea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote:
> we think there are some interface changes are
> going to improve both the user experience and the value of the enwiki
> trial.
Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of
flagged rev
On 3 March 2010 20:53, Andrew Gray wrote:
> mid-2007 - - - - - $1m
> end-2007 - - - - - $2.3m - - - - - $0.21m - - - - - 11 mos.
> mid-2008 - - - - - $3m - - - - - ($0.32m) - - - - - 9 mos.
> end-2008 - - - - - $6.7m - - - - - $0.43m - - - - - 15 mos.
> mid-2009 - - - - - $6.2m - - - - - ($0.54m)
On 03/04/2010 10:57 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Purely as a point of fact it is simply inaccurate that the
> 20 implementations of flagged revs and patrolled edits
> across the other wikies than English Wikipedia are
> monolithically identical. I know this firsthand.
>
Sorry if I gave t
William Pietri wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 09:20 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
>
>> William Pietri wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
>>> frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
>>> opinions of how close we are. Eventua
Even better is [1], since it includes commits to
FlaggedRevs other than Aaron's.
-Chad
[1]
http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki?path=/trunk/extensions/FlaggedRevs
On Mar 4, 2010 1:20 PM, "William Pietri" wrote:
On 03/04/2010 09:59 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> William has mentioned the
On 03/04/2010 09:59 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> William has mentioned there are software checkins, etc. in progress.
> Even a list of those would be excellent stuff.
>
This appears to be the best source:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/author/aaron
William
___
On 03/04/2010 09:20 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
> William Pietri wrote:
>
>> Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
>> frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
>> opinions of how close we are. Eventually, both the builders and the
>> communit
On 4 March 2010 17:20, MZMcBride wrote:
> Also, David Gerard made a suggestion about weekly updates that concretely
> list the progress that's being made with regard to FlaggedRevs development.
William has mentioned there are software checkins, etc. in progress.
Even a list of those would be ex
On 03/03/2010 06:41 PM, Veronique Kessler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The question of what is the right reserve amount is a common one. I've
> hear of ranges from 0 to 3 months to 3 years. I agree that one year is
> a good measure and that could be increased or decreased depending on a
> variety of circumst
William Pietri wrote:
> Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
> frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
> opinions of how close we are. Eventually, both the builders and the
> community will agree that there's something worth shipping. A
Hi, Stephen. Thanks for making your point in a polite, low-drama way.
On 03/04/2010 05:58 AM, Stephen Bain wrote:
>> The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
>> > the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
>>
> That's normally the perfect
Spasiba Yaroslav! :-)
I thought I'm all alone with my opinion that it works.
Paka,
Peter
Hungary
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 16:06, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>> "Years" is a bit of an exaggeration. German Wikipedia was first and
>> that was May 6, 2008. That's a little under 2 years. I don't think
hm, wouldn't that be more a question that would suit more the board? It
seems a rather strategic one.
Lodewijk
2010/3/4 Geoffrey Plourde
> Veronique, what would be the maximum we'd want to go with a reserve fund. I
> know that with Army Emergency Relief for example, they get dinged by Charity
>
You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
EFF is probably getting involved over). However, the proper response to that
is for the alleged infringer to request sanctions against the copyright
ho
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
>
> The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
> the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
That's normally the perfect answer, but the point of this discussion
is that it's not unreasonable
Hoi,
The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
Thanks,
GerardM
2010/3/4 MZMcBride
> Erik Moeller wrote:
> > We're very thankful for Aaron's hard work on the FlaggedRevs extension
> > over the year
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Chad wrote:
> I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
> en.wikipedia to "simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
> use it" until the proposed enwiki changes are ready.
>
> -Chad
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> 2010/3/1 Austin Hair :
>> I think it would be great if someone
>> on the project could put the initial tone aside, turn the other cheek,
>> and let everyone interested (and I know there are several) know what's
>> going on.
>
> Hi Austin et al
Erik Moeller wrote:
> We're very thankful for Aaron's hard work on the FlaggedRevs extension
> over the years; it's really almost entirely due to him that the
> extension is now in active use in more than 20 wikis, with more than
> 1M pages patrolled in dewiki alone. That's an amazing achievement f
26 matches
Mail list logo
