Re: [PATCH] fortran: Factor array descriptor references

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > Regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > OK for master? > Yes, with one observation below. > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc > index 1561936daf1..af62e17442b 100644 > --- a/gcc/fortran/tran

Re: ICE with new IMPORT feature

Yes Ok to push. Thanks. Jerry On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, 9:44 AM Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > The failure that Steve mentioned below is fixed. ChangeLogs and patch are > self-describing. > > Regtests fine - OK for mainline? > > Paul > > On Sat, 12 Jul 202

[Patch, fortran] PR121060 - ICE when argument is associate name created from type-bound operator result

At first this PR looked as if it was going to be one of those horrible typebound procedure/operator tangles. However, it turned out that this was entirely down to the attempt to extract the specific procedure for the ASSOCIATE name during parsing. Returning NULL before expression resolution fixed

Aw: Re: Add: [Bug fortran/121043] [16 Regression] Tests of OpenCoarray fail to pass, works on 15.1.1 20250712

Hi Andre, Jerry kindly sent me the full path: https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/OpenCoarrays/blob/vehre/issue-779-form-team/src/tests/unit/teams/test_teams_1.f90 Frankly, you need to provide more details for me. Or maybe someone else can jump in and help me out... (Note: the above testcase f

Re: Questions on `scan` Intrinsic Implementation (For Fortran 2023 `split` procedure)

Hi Mikael, On 7/14/2025 8:46 PM, Mikael Morin wrote: Le 13/07/2025 à 16:39, c8ef a écrit : Hi all, I'm currently working on implementing the `split` procedure, which was added in Fortran 2023. Given its similar functionality to the `scan` intrinsic, I've been learning the implementation of `

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR121060 - ICE when argument is associate name created from type-bound operator result

OK Paul, thanks. We probably ought to back port it to 15 On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, 9:22 AM Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > At first this PR looked as if it was going to be one of those horrible > typebound procedure/operator tangles. However, it turned out that this was

ICE with new IMPORT feature

Dear All, The failure that Steve mentioned below is fixed. ChangeLogs and patch are self-describing. Regtests fine - OK for mainline? Paul On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 at 19:57, Steve Kargl wrote: > All, Paul, > > In testing Paul's recent addition of support for IMPORT, > I have uncovered an ICE due t