OK Paul, thanks. We probably ought to back port it to 15 On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, 9:22 AM Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At first this PR looked as if it was going to be one of those horrible > typebound procedure/operator tangles. However, it turned out that this was > entirely down to the attempt to extract the specific procedure for the > ASSOCIATE name during parsing. Returning NULL before expression resolution > fixed the problem. > > Regtests fine - OK for mainline? I am inclined to backport, since the fix > is both simple and, at worst, defers the ICE. OK? > > Paul > >
