Angular JS ( Finally the JS project that comes close to Flex! ).

2012-04-25 Thread ganaraj p r
checked out Ext JS! ). Worth checking it out! http://www.angularjs.org -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: Angular JS ( Finally the JS project that comes close to Flex! ).

2012-04-26 Thread ganaraj p r
gor G." wrote: > > >> > > >> > If you are interested in this kinda stuff checkout knockout.js > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:48 PM, aYo ~ wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I am checking it out - l

Re: [discussion]Thoughts on immediate future of Flex

2012-02-06 Thread ganaraj p r
, just doing. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: [RT] Awesome FlexNext User Experience (was: Starting with the Whiteboard code)

2012-02-10 Thread ganaraj p r
ponsiveness is key: The more stuff that has to run at a time the > less likely it will rock. > * All assets should be open-source: Don't build on royal fonts or > imagery. > > What would you think of such a request? Is that something that the PPMC > think is useful? Should we rock that? > > Note: The various concepts should be presented in the Wiki. > > yours > Martin. > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: [RT] Awesome FlexNext User Experience (was: Starting with the Whiteboard code)

2012-02-20 Thread ganaraj p r
e. This way all the IDE's could > > provide the same Flex documentation that "interacts" with their editor. > > > > Just thoughts. > > > > yours > > Martin. > > > > [1] http://eval.hurlant.com/ > > [2] http://www.victordramba.com/?p=31 > > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: [gosh] Compiler choice [was Goshawk language choices and more]

2012-02-21 Thread ganaraj p r
piler we choose, surely? The > mxmlc compiler is far from perfect, but it exists and works already. My gut > feeling is that you are right and that we should strive for something new > rather than trying to improve it. I just worry we might have been too hasty > in completely disregarding it. > > David. > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: [OT] Flash Platform roadmap

2012-02-22 Thread ganaraj p r
lex as a Flash-based > technology, > no matter how one looks at it. > > David. > > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: Flex adopting haXe ?

2012-02-22 Thread ganaraj p r
r all, if you wanted speed, you should be using XMLNode anyway. > > At the same time I started writing a validating SAX parser for XML, never > finished it though, but "finishing" it means ensuring things really work as > advertised. If implemented using fast memory, it could be, possibly, quite > fast, but even if not, then it would be still faster then a regular > expression based version. > > http://code.google.com/p/e4xu/source/browse/trunk/haxe/src/org/wvxvws/xml/Sax.hx > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: [RT] haxe reality check

2012-02-23 Thread ganaraj p r
uot;flash.utils.getDefinitionByName"](name); } > > so that it looks nicer. > bu I don't think the converse will work, i.e. __global__["multiply"] = > function(x) { x * x; } probably won't do anything, or not what you'd hope > it may do. Ha, now I'm curious :) > > However, GPL vs Apache license seems like a tough one... > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: Apache Flex suggestion - dumping SWF support in favor of HTML5 - don't listen to Steve!

2012-02-24 Thread ganaraj p r
rome-or-forget-flash > > Have a look on their Player roadmap as well... seems to be going far away > from Apache Flex vision... Games? Video boards? > > Rafael Santos > CEO at Specta > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R

Re: Haxe and Flex

2012-03-14 Thread ganaraj p r
oach it as you have much > deeper > > understanding of haxe and mapping on a Js/HTML target. > > > > Oleg's suggestion to use his minimum set as a starting point could be a > > nice. > > > > Arnoud > > > > > [1] > > http://lists.motion-twin.com/pipermail/haxe/2008-November/020644.html > > > > > > - Niel > > > > > > > > > -- Regards, Ganaraj P R