Le 27/11/2012 23:04, christofer.d...@c-ware.de a écrit :
> Even if I'm currently the project lead of Flexmojos, I would strongly suggest
> not to go that road.
>
> There is far too much legacy stuff to carry with Flexmojos and I have to
> admit that the rather restricive communication policy of
Le 27/11/2012 19:46, Alex Harui a écrit :
> 1. Number of people who will use Maven to develop Flex apps at your company
> (0 if you have no interest in using Maven).
5-10
(Small agency, we're using maven to build /every/ Flash/Flex based
project since Flex 3).
> 2. Maven would be used to develop a
Le 28/11/2012 13:56, christofer.d...@c-ware.de a écrit :
> Then it outputs the license text to the console (and hereby to the screen
> and/or log). If this is an interactive build, it prompts the user to accept
> the license, if it's a non-interactive build it generates a token (UUID) and
> outp
Le 28/11/2012 18:35, Alex Harui a écrit :
>
>
> On 11/28/12 2:22 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>> ...6. Rate the following proposed implementations (-1 = not acceptable, 0 =
>>> neutral, 1 = acceptable, 2 = preferred)
>>> a) You must
Le 26/04/2012 02:36, Alex Harui a écrit :
We discovered yesterday that playerglobal.swc is not under MPL and is still
under Adobe license. Same for the AIR SDK.
This is kinda weird.
playerglobal.swc is (and has always be) part of the 'opensource' version
of the SDK
(http://opensource.adobe.
Le 26/04/2012 19:02, Alex Harui a écrit :
On 4/26/12 4:48 AM, "Simon Morvan" wrote:
Le 26/04/2012 02:36, Alex Harui a écrit :
BTW, playerglobal is redistributed in the 'mavenized' version you can
find on Sonatype repository that is crafted by velo (Flemojos author).
Re
x SDK broken by design IMHO and
dangerously dependent on Adobe future decisions regarding those files.
--
Simon Morvan
