[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33273) CSSCondition.matchesStyleClient() is slow and creates excessive garbage

2012-12-09 Thread Maurice Nicholson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527371#comment-13527371 ] Maurice Nicholson commented on FLEX-33273: -- Ok, thanks for running the tests. So

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33273) CSSCondition.matchesStyleClient() is slow and creates excessive garbage

2012-12-09 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527374#comment-13527374 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33273: Yes, exactly that but I applied the patch

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
One quick test I do is to generate the base-line images running mustella against 4.6, and then run mustella against the current tests that were failing. That should at least work for the image comparison issues you are seeing.. That is at least what I was doing for the charting components before

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Nick, Tell me if I'm wrong, but regenerating them against the 4.6 is the same than the 4.8 as they both use the same swfVersion, right ? At the end, you just regenerate them against your own system, right ? - Fred -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski Sent: Sunday, Decem

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Well, the point is to test any code that you may have broke. 4.6 is supposed to be the baseline, and if I break something that was working in 4.6, then I need to know about it. -Nick On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Tell me if I'm wrong, but regenerating th

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33273) CSSCondition.matchesStyleClient() is slow and creates excessive garbage

2012-12-09 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527508#comment-13527508 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33273: I ran the all test suite against your pat

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Nick, Ok, I guess I see your point, it's just when you change the code of the framework, it might makes differences in the generated images, right ? So, it would mean that AdvancedDataGrid and Charts failed because of other changes in the framework or I missed somthing in the reason you rege

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
If you get the same failures with or without the patch, then it is ok to accept the patch. I know it isn't the safest policy, but I think it is good enough, especially to not discourage community contributions. Well, actually, only 1 test has returned differently, [1] failed without the patch

Incubator PMC/Board report for Dec 2012 ([ppmc])

2012-12-09 Thread Marvin
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The report for your podling wil

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33233) Mustella tests failed with FP10.3

2012-12-09 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527548#comment-13527548 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33233: I'm about to patch the mustella test suit

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33134) New Apache Flex website

2012-12-09 Thread Ashish Desai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527551#comment-13527551 ] Ashish Desai commented on FLEX-33134: - Guys, I had a look at the template files at (h

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (FLEX-33233) Mustella tests failed with FP10.3

2012-12-09 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frédéric THOMAS updated FLEX-33233: --- Comment: was deleted (was: I'm about to patch the mustella test suite and test files as well

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33242) Mustella tests failed: when your computer language doesn't match the expected localized error

2012-12-09 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527554#comment-13527554 ] Frédéric THOMAS commented on FLEX-33242: I'm about to patch the mustella test suit

[Mustella] Localized Test Suite

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi, I commented in JIRA[1] but wanted to write down something on the list to make sure everyone has a chance to know what is going to change in Mustella. A- Localization: Until now, the tests were ran only on computers whose operating system was in English, out since Mustella was given to Ap

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Usually the goal is to /not/ change the image that is generated. If it changes, that means it has the potential to break somebody's code, or some project relying on the behavior that existed before. Mustella, as you are aware is a functional testing suite, so in addition to checking the validity

[jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33134) New Apache Flex website

2012-12-09 Thread Nick Kwiatkowski (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527620#comment-13527620 ] Nick Kwiatkowski commented on FLEX-33134: - Ashish, You can read more about it at

[FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

2012-12-09 Thread Michael Schmalle
Hi, Seeing as winter is here in NewHampshire and ice covers the ground, I used the opportunity to put my money where my mouth is; NOTE: All the javascript is generated by code I wrote using the AST/Visitor/Walker pattern of the node hierarchy and their corresponding definitions. I have i

Incubator PMC/Board report for Dec 2012 ([ppmc])

2012-12-09 Thread Marvin
Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. The report for your podling wil

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

2012-12-09 Thread Michael Schmalle
Well this is what I have up to this point. Some missing semi colons, maybe some other stuff. But the recursion on expressions, binary and unary operators are working great. Got anonymous functions, getters, setters, try etc. working. Will have to be schooled on the use of 'this' and other t

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Nick, Thank you for clarifying these points :) - Fred. -Message d'origine- From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 9:18 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed Usually the goal is to /not/ change the image that is generated.

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Alex Harui
Might be a timing issue. Does it consistently fail for you? I'll try to capture my approach to test debugging in the wiki when I start in on those other failures. The basic recipe is: 0) Use mini_run.sh -failures to generate SWFs that run as few tests as possible. 1) find the test mxml file 2)

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Alex, Might be a timing issue. Does it consistently fail for you? Yes. I use fdb instead of an IDE to debug because fdb makes it easy to launch any SWF and debug it. I used it once only and it's a bit a pain but ok, yes, I'll do that. - Fred. -Message d'origine- From: Alex H

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Alex Harui
> > I used it once only and it's a bit a pain but ok, yes, I'll do that. > Supposedly, there is a way to get FlashBuilder to connect to any SWF as well. I don't know it though. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I've got a version yeah, gonna try that tonight, I didn't even think it was possible going thru it. -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 7:08 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed I used it once only and it's a

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Om
1. Create a new file under bin-debug/debug.html with nothing in it. 2. Create a new debug configuration. In the "URL or path to launch", point it to bin-debug/html 2. Run the debug configuration 3. Flash Builder launches the bin-debug/debug.html file and waits to connect to the running applicat

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Cheers Om :) Actually, I was curious and I tried to get a way and I found one, yours seems better anyway. - Fred -Message d'origine- From: Om Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 7:44 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed 1. Create a new file under

Re: [Mustella] 90 tests failed

2012-12-09 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
@Alex, it was like that : target="mx.resources::ResourceManager.getInstance()" eventName="change" timeout="1000" /> code="ed4=ResourceManager.getInstance().loadResourceModule('assets/bundles/custom/resMod_loadResourceModule_enUS_bund

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

2012-12-09 Thread Frank Wienberg
Mike, this is really great news! Wow! I'd really like to get my hands on that code of yours! On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > How do we want default arguments dealt with on functions? What about this: http://blog.jangaroo.net/2012/01/simulating-actionscript-parameter.

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

2012-12-09 Thread Alex Harui
On 12/9/12 11:28 PM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote: > Mike, this is really great news! Wow! I'd really like to get my hands on > that code of yours! I'd like to see it too. FWIW, I think I have successfully found a way to get FalconJS to call my MXMLClassDirectiveProcessor so I think I can now start

Re: [FalconJx] A new baby cross compiler experiement for AS -> JS using Falcon

2012-12-09 Thread Frank Wienberg
Alex, thanks for the advice, it's my first time in an Apache project, so any help on processes is highly appreciated. I'll clarify these issues with my employer! -Frank- On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 12/9/12 11:28 PM, "Frank Wienberg" wrote: > > > Mike, this is