ID 42: 3pts
ID 48: 2pts
> From: "Rick Winscot"
> Is anyone under the impression that they are going to be able to swap out
the Adobe Flex 4.6 SDK for Apache Flex 4.7 without issues??? I think we are
loosing track of the fact that what we are doing here in all likelihood is
_not_ going to be a drop-in replacement for
> From: "Doug McCune"
>
> One of the reasons for people being optimistic about the move to Apache
is
> the opportunity for bugs that people couldn't get Adobe to fix to get
> fixed. To show progress and momentum I'd urge you all to try to fix some
> bugs and get releases out there that people can
ID 08: 1pt
ID 43: 4pt
ID 53: 1pt
ID 43: 4pt
ID 08 - 2
ID 14 - 2
ID 42 - 1
Regards,
Saurabh
> If you force everyone to rewrite their apps using the new
> > packages throughout you're going to lose those people from your cause.
>
> A huge agree on this. This will foster adoption of the new framework and
> build momentum for its evolution.
Very good point and I agree, I would be careful
ID 40: 5pts
ID 14: 1pt
ID 35: 2pts
ID 42: 1pt
ID 51: 1pt
ID 15: 1 pt
ID 40: 4 pts
ID 03: 1pt
ID 40: 4pts
El 19 de enero de 2012 06:25, Doug Arthur escribió:
> We have had an overwhelming amount of logo submissions. Now it's time
> to decide which one will become the new image of Flex, and pave the
> way for the future of Apache Flex on its new journey.
>
>
> This is the conse
ID 40: 4ptsID 26: 1pt
ID 8: 2,5pt
ID 29: 2,5pt
ID 40: 5pts
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:25:44 -0700
> Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
> From: dougart...@apache.org
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> We have had an overwhelming amount of logo submissions. Now it's time
> to decide which one will become the new image of Flex, and pave the
> w
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-14: 3 pts.
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-12: 1 pt.
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-25: 1 pt.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> ...I fixed the missing logo entries, set the maximum size to 50% and added
> some
> visual helpers.
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19407988/apache-flex/flex-logos.html
Thanks!
There's a lesson here I think: publishing an ugly page like mine
u
ID 48: 1pt
ID 40: 4pts
> > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:25:44 -0700
> > Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
> > From: dougart...@apache.org
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > We have had an overwhelming amount of logo submissions. Now it's time
> > to decide which one will become the new image
ID 48: 1pt
ID 40: 4pts
> > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:25:44 -0700
> > Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
> > From: dougart...@apache.org
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > We have had an overwhelming amount of logo submissions. Now it's time
> > to decide which one will become the new image o
ID 48: 1pt
ID 40: 4pts
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Doug Arthur wrote:
> ...Official Logo page: http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.html
> Convenience view: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/715349/tmp/flex-logos.html
> (Use with Caution, unofficial)..
In the meantime, Martin Heidegger created a more convenient uno
ID 29: 2pts
ID 40: 2pts
ID 42: 1pts
ID 9: 1pt
ID 14: 1pt
ID 27: 1pt
ID 40: 1pt
ID 49: 1pt
Met vriendelijke groet,
Arnoud Bos
Artim interactive
E arn...@artim-interactive.nl
W www.artim-interactive.nl
T +31 6 246 40 216
A Elisabeth Wolffstraat 77-3
1053TT Amsterdam
ID 2: 2 pts
ID 19: 1 pt
ID 29: 2 pts
--
Ivan Ilijašić
Adobe Certified Expert
Adobe UG Manager
email: ivan.ilija...@gmail.com
web: http://www.flashr.org
mob: +385 (0)98 634 373
-
Latest projects | www.svjetskiputnik.hr | www.architectureexposed.com
ID 40: 4ptID 23: 1pt
> On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 5:49 PM,
> Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Adobe definitely intends to let Apache use the Flex name, but apparently
> there are repercussions with a straight up "donation". So, unfortunately, I
> still can't guarantee anything in that area right now.
Hopefully I am just
ID 40: 4ptsID 05: 1pt
Sorry I vote 1 before :S
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:25:44 -0700
> Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
> From: dougart...@apache.org
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
> We have had an overwhelming amount of logo submissions. Now it's time
> to decide which one will become the
> From: "Peter Elst"
>
> (...) an experimental branch of the Flex
> framework that we can get feedback on to see what works and what doesn't
> before it goes into the core code base.
>
> - Peter
I generally agree with this idea, as long as we are aware of the cost
required to maintain two main
ID:40-->4pts
ID:6-->1pts
Hi all,
I'm keeping the tally on a spreadsheet that I'll publish as soon as the
first round finishes in order to help tallying the votes. We've had a
pretty good participation so far.
If there's a general consensus on publishing this document earlier (I'd
rather not, in order to not influence
I also only saw the ship once someone mentioned it :-). So I don't think we
have to worry about that.
However I do see the F submerged in water with a sun setting behind it.
It's also very pretty.
I wonder what it would look like with words, rather than the F, reflecting?
John
2012/1/18 Nataliy
ID 42 => 5pts
ID:49-->5pts
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-42: 3pts
http://s.apache.org/af-logo-48: 2pts
> If there's a general consensus on publishing this document earlier (I'd
> rather not, in order to not influence voters), I'll do it.
Thanks Rui, I think thats sensible - not hiding anything, people who have
too much time on their hands can still count the votes manually.
What are you doing wi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:30 AM, David Arno wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 5:49 PM,
>> Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>> Adobe definitely intends to let Apache use the Flex name, but apparently
>> there are repercussions with a straight up "donation". So, unfortunately, I
>> still can't guaran
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
> Sent: 19 January 2012 09:57
>
> I'm not a trademarks specialist by far, AFAIK the key point is that to
> keep the name, the ASF must be able to use it freely in the future, without
> it being controlled by an external entity. A "stra
I'm a bit confused now:
Do we vote on this list or do we use the link provided earlier:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGRaaGZXZTk1Sk9Jb0w1eHlOX1pBanc6MQ
-Dany
Op 19-jan.-2012, om 10:56 heeft Peter Elst het volgende geschreven:
>> If there's a general consensus on publis
Fréderic,
You have to split up your vote to at least 2 entries.
Original Message
> From: "Fréderic Cox"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 9:51
> To: "Apache Flex Mailing List"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID 42 => 5pts
Ok, I missed that.
But to be honest I had a very strong preference.
I'll keep an eye out on the reply to this and if I
need to think again then I will
Thanks for the heads up
glenn
-Original Message-
From: Dany Dhondt [mailto:archeme...@mac.com]
Sent: 19 January 2012 10:02
To: flex-de
Hi Glenn,
Please split up the vote across at least 2 entries (in accordance to the
rules).
Cheers,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Glenn Williams"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 9:55
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID:49-->5p
2012/1/19 Alex Harui :
> I was in the Falcon code in November. It was way easier to figure out how
> to make changes than with MXMLC. Even if it is not documented, I think it
> will be easier to make progress that with the Falcon code base.
I agree, that sounds like it would be much better to use
> From: "Dany Dhondt"
>
> Do we vote on this list or do we use the link provided earlier:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGRaaGZXZTk1Sk9Jb0w1eHl
OX1pBanc6MQ
>
> -Dany
On the list, please.
Thanks,
Rui
29: 1pt
42: 4pts
On 19/01/12 11:05, "Rui Silva" wrote:
>Fréderic,
>
>You have to split up your vote to at least 2 entries.
>
> Original Message
>> From: "Fréderic Cox"
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 9:51
>> To: "Apache Flex Mailing List"
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lo
ID 02: 1pts
ID 14: 2pts
ID 29: 2pt
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:03 AM, David Arno wrote:
>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 19 January 2012 09:57
>>
>> I'm not a trademarks specialist by far, AFAIK the key point is that to
>> keep the name, the ASF must be able to use it freely in the future, withou
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
> Sent: 19 January 2012 10:18
>
> However, I would suggest waiting for Alex's news about what Adobe's position
> is
> before doing anything. Alex said "Adobe definitely intends to let Apache use
> the
> Flex name" so I don't see an i
Simple: Votes where all 5 points are allocated to one logo shall be ignored
since they violate the rules. Obviously if the person corrects his mistake
during the voting period, then his corrected vote can count.
In the case of a PPMC member making this mistake, oweing to his importance
I would try
ID 08: 2 pts
ID 40: 2 pts
ID 36: 1 pt
Op 19-jan.-2012, om 11:14 heeft Paul Evans het volgende geschreven:
> ID 02: 1pts
> ID 14: 2pts
> ID 29: 2pt
ID 08: 4pts
ID 46: 1pt
2012/1/19 Dany Dhondt
> ID 08: 2 pts
> ID 40: 2 pts
> ID 36: 1 pt
>
>
> Op 19-jan.-2012, om 11:14 heeft Paul Evans het volgende geschreven:
>
> > ID 02: 1pts
> > ID 14: 2pts
> > ID 29: 2pt
>
>
ID 04: 1 pt.
ID 35: 2 pts.
ID 40: 1 pt.
Am 19.01.2012 um 08:24 schrieb Jun Heider:
> ID 05: 1 pt.
> ID 42: 3 pts.
> ID 49: 1 pt.
ID 04: 3pt
ID 14: 2pt
ID: 40 --> 4 pts
ID: 42 --> 1pts
ID 01: 1pt
ID 08: 1pt
ID 12: 1pt
ID 42: 2pt
ID 49: 4pts
ID 40: 1pts
(binding)
- Peter
Sorry but it's unclear to me what are the final decisions about the vote.
Who can vote?
What is the reference page? There is that list compiled by Jeffry Houser,
another one on the "official" logo contest page, ...
Where we vote? the google spreadsheet, on the list, ...
It's too difficult browsin
> Who can vote?
>
anyone
What is the reference page?
Official Logo page: http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.html
Convenience view: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/715349/tmp/flex-logos.html
(Use with Caution, unofficial)
Where we vote?
On the mailinglist, in the [VOTE] Logo contest thre
ID 49: 4pts
ID 42: 1pts
Okay, thanks!
2012/1/19 Peter Elst
> > Who can vote?
> >
>
> anyone
>
> What is the reference page?
>
>
>
> Official Logo page: http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.html
> Convenience view: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/715349/tmp/flex-logos.html
> (Use with Caution, unofficial)
>
>
> Where w
ID 6: 1
ID 27: 1
ID 40: 3
ID 40: 2pts
ID 42: 3pts
ID43: 1 pt
ID12: 4 pts
ID12: 3
ID23: 2
ID 49 : 3 pts
ID 48 : 2 pts
ID 49: 2pt
ID 35: 2pt
ID 14: 1pt
Joan
ID 06 - 1 pt
ID 18 - 1 pt
ID 29 - 1 pt
ID 42 - 1 pt
ID 50 - 1 pt
Claudiu
ID12: 3
ID33: 1
ID12: 1
Sorry. Edited.
ID12: 3
ID33: 1
ID42: 1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Ricky Martin wrote:
> ID12: 3
> ID33: 1
> ID12: 1
>
ID 40 : 4 pt
ID 50 : 1 pt
El 19/01/2012 12:17, "Joan Llenas Masó"
escribió:
> ID 49: 2pt
> ID 35: 2pt
> ID 14: 1pt
>
> Joan
>
Marcus,
You have just used 4 points. Please re-vote using 5 points.
Original Message
> From: "Marcus Fritze"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 10:51
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, "Marcus Fritze"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID 04: 1 pt.
> ID 35: 2
ID 42: 1 pt
ID 49: 3 pt
ID 54: 1 pt
ID 36: 1pts
ID 40: 4pts
ID 42: 2pts
ID 29: 2pts
ID 35: 1pt
ID 42: 2.5 pt
ID 49: 2.5 pt
Due to our last discussion about code examples, I would like
to discuss the procedure we should follow when writing these
code examples.
I also would like to point out that there is a difference between
writing Component Code Examples which should illustrate the
functionality of a component (
ID 49: 3pt
ID 29: 2pt
ID 34: 1pt
ID 48: 2.5pts
ID 49: 1.5 pts
ID 14: 1pt
ID 15: 1pt
ID 34: 1pt
ID 38: 1pt
ID 49: 1pt
Hi Denis and others,
my posted voting was only a suggestion from me. This is / was not the official
voting / voting result. So I removed it. This was only my suggestion to finally
start the voting procedure.
Please vote via mailing list ( flex-dev@incubator.apache.org on Topic "[VOTE]
Logo con
Hi,
Just a quick update on the voting process:
54 members have voted, of which 2 are binding.
Thanks,
Rui
Oh my God, how could this happen? This is embarrassing. Shame on me.
ID 04: 1 pt.
ID 35: 3 pts.
ID 40: 1 pt.
Marcus
Am 19.01.2012 um 12:33 schrieb Rui Silva:
> Marcus,
>
> You have just used 4 points. Please re-vote using 5 points.
>
> Original Message
>> From: "Marcus Fritz
ID 42: 5pt
ID 34: 4pt
ID 14: 5pt
ID 09: 4pt
ID 29: 2pt
ID 49: 4pt
ID 54: 2pt
I think you missed the point.
Please check out the voting instructions here:
http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc
Original Message
> From: "Garrafa Pet 2 Litros"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 12:29
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE]
ID 2: 1pt.
ID 27 : 2pts.
ID 36 : 1pt.
ID 42 : 1pt.
ID 42: 3pt
ID 25: 2pt
ID 48: 4pts
ID 49: 1pt
It's pretty impressive the amount of people interested in pushing flex
forward. Is there a way to know how many users are subscribed to the
flex-dev mailing list?
Thanks,
João Saleiro
@joaosaleiro
+1
-Mensagem Original-
From: João Saleiro
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 1:32 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: How many people are on the flex-dev ML?
It's pretty impressive the amount of people interested in pushing flex
forward. Is there a way to know how many users a
2012/1/19 João Saleiro :
> ...It's pretty impressive the amount of people interested in pushing flex
> forward. Is there a way to know how many users are subscribed to the
> flex-dev mailing list?..
Yes, search for flex- at http://pulse.apache.org/
-Bertrand
For the lazy folks:
Current subscribers:237
Current digest subscribers:3
Total posts (10 days):1116
Mean posts *per* day:111.60
cheers :)
Roland
On 19 January 2012 14:42, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> 2012/1/19 João Saleiro :
> > ...It's pretty impressive the amount of people interested in pus
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> For example, an MXML tag resulted in a UIComponentDescriptor for MX
> components and a tree of functions for Spark components. The plan was to
> have an MXML tag result in an entry in an Array that consisted of the class
> followed by property
ID 01: 1 pt.
ID 02: 1 pt.
ID 14: 1 pt.
ID 19: 1 pt.
ID 35: 1 pt.
[Binding]
14 - 1
15 - 1
42 - 3
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Entrepreneur
203-379-0773
--
http://www.flextras.com?c=104
UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
--
http://www.theflexshow.com
http://www.jeffryhouser.com
http://www.asktheflexpert.com
--
Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
ID 29: 3pt
ID 49: 2pt
ID 14: 2pt
ID 40: 2pt
ID 25: 1pt
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jack Freudenheim wrote:
> ID 29: 3pt
> ID 49: 2pt
>
>
>
15 - 2
49 - 3
id 42: 3pt
id 35: 2pt
id 49: 1pt
Application architecture, coding conventions and "best practices" are all
topics with high contention. People usually have very strong opinions on
what they think is the "right way" and what they will not do. Because of
that I would rather prefer that we steered way clear of trying to come up
with
ID 05: 2points
ID 29: 1point
ID 04: 2points
On 19 Jan 2012 08:28, "Matthius Andy" wrote:
> ID 08: 1pt
> ID 43: 4pt
>
04: 2 points
05: 2 points
29: 1 point
Are not 8 and 29 the same? Should we combine the votes for those 2
into one or ask the submitter to withdraw one of them?
08 - : http://s.apache.org/af-logo-08
29 - : http://s.apache.org/af-logo-29
Greg
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
