Re: SVN vs Git

I created a quick blog post about the process to submit from Git. I'm not 100% sure if everything is accurate, so please feel free to comment. I always wanted to start a page in the wiki about this to lead new contributors, but I don

Re: SVN vs Git

On 2/21/12 12:54 PM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote: > And I would assume this would still be in patch form? or would that be > pull requests through JIRA? > > M Please submit patches as attachments to JIRA issues. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Re: SVN vs Git

And I would assume this would still be in patch form? or would that be pull requests through JIRA? M On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 2/21/12 12:29 PM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote: > > > That's awesome. Quick question though, if I fork it, can I do pull > > requests

Re: SVN vs Git

On 2/21/12 12:29 PM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote: > That's awesome. Quick question though, if I fork it, can I do pull > requests and will they be used? Or should I do patches and submit to the > commit mailing list? > Please submit patches via JIRA -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems,

Re: SVN vs Git

That's awesome. Quick question though, if I fork it, can I do pull requests and will they be used? Or should I do patches and submit to the commit mailing list? M On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > On Tuesday, February 21, 2012, Bryan Hunt wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012

Re: SVN vs Git

On Tuesday, February 21, 2012, Bryan Hunt wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:16:57 -0500, Nicholas Kwiatkowski < > nicho...@spoon.as > wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/alternative > > Already done :) > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex > > > > -Nick > > Man, Subversion sucks, how come you guys ar

Re: SVN vs Git

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:16:57 -0500, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: Non-text part: multipart/alternative > Already done :) > > https://github.com/apache/flex > > -Nick Man, Subversion sucks, how come you guys are using it in 2012 anyway? Regards, Bryan Hunt

Re: SVN vs Git

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > https://github.com/apache/flex See also http://git.apache.org/ for other mirrors and docs about how to use them. -Bertrand

Re: SVN vs Git

Hi, > Now that we have the subversion code from Adobe, who's going to work on > creating a git mirror of it? Believe it's already done (although I've not checked it out). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4366 You can also use git-svn to check the code out of SVN into a local git repos

Re: SVN vs Git

Already done :) https://github.com/apache/flex -Nick On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Michel Boudreau wrote: > Now that we have the subversion code from Adobe, who's going to work on > creating a git mirror of it? > > M > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Deirdre Holub >wrote: > > > Given the

Re: SVN vs Git

Now that we have the subversion code from Adobe, who's going to work on creating a git mirror of it? M On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Deirdre Holub wrote: > Given the conversation on this thread, should the status page be > recommending building proposals at github (bullet points two and three

Re: SVN vs Git

Given the conversation on this thread, should the status page be recommending building proposals at github (bullet points two and three under 'Things that could use some help')? On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Mon, Feb 13,

[WIKI] Become a part was Re: SVN vs Git

On 14/02/2012 04:43, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: I added a note to that page as it's not exactly how things work and pointed to [2] which is more correct and complete - in particular, people are not expected to ask to become committers, it's the PPMC members who are expected to be looking for po

Re: SVN vs Git

Hi Martin, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Martin Heidegger wrote: > On 14/02/2012 03:38, David Arno wrote: >> ...I'd assumed (wrongly) >> that it was hard to become a committer. I hadn't realised that when I start >> submitting patches, it would almost be expected that I become one... > I hadn

Re: SVN vs Git

On 14/02/2012 03:38, David Arno wrote: I hadn't realised that was the way things worked. I'd assumed (wrongly) that it was hard to become a committer. I hadn't realised that when I start submitting patches, it would almost be expected that I become one :) David. I hadn't realized that as wel

Re: SVN vs Git

I hadn't realised that was the way things worked. I'd assumed (wrongly) that it was hard to become a committer. I hadn't realised that when I start submitting patches, it would almost be expected that I become one :) David. - Reply message - From: "Greg Reddin" Date: Mon, Feb 13, 201

Re: SVN vs Git

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, David Arno wrote: > We may well want to undertake > some big changes, involving lots of people who aren't committers. There's a little problem with statements like this that we need to be careful about. If we get involved in doing lots of work that is involving l

Re: SVN vs Git [MENTOR]

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Martin Heidegger wrote: >> Martin, Nick brings up something here that we need to be very careful of. >> If we hope to graduate from the incubator then we need to be sure we're >> doing things the "Apache Way". If we start working over on github I think >> there i

Re: SVN vs Git

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:08 AM, David Arno wrote: > If all the PPMC members are going to take Nicholas' "if I wasn't involved, > then I won't accept it" attitude to the efforts of non-PPMC people, then the > rest of us might as well just give up and go home now... I would personally love officia

Re: SVN vs Git

On 2/13/2012 10:57 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: Because of leagalise, we can't allow a github-style open-source project. Based on my understanding of the Apache License and trademark stuff; there is no reason someone can't create a copy of "Apache Flex' on GitHub as long as they don't call

Re: SVN vs Git [MENTOR]

On 14/02/2012 02:03, Kevin Korngut wrote: As I said: Those groups and proposals could send it back using diffs and entries. At this point a discussion would be documented. So: While a community at github would "prepare" a proposal the final discussion for a integration would go on here. Martin,

RE: SVN vs Git

I'm definitely in agreement with Martin here. Because Apache has (very necessary) policies to control what gets committed, it is not really geared toward the potentially large community involvement that Flex might attract when we finally get a chance to get going. We may well want to undertake some

Re: SVN vs Git

> > > > Discussion and code that happen outside Apache "don't happen" (that is how >> all apache projects work). >> > > As I said: Those groups and proposals could send it back using diffs and > entries. At this point a discussion would > be documented. So: While a community at github would "prepa

Re: SVN vs Git

On 14/02/2012 01:15, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: Understood, but PPMC members won't be watching the github instance -- we will only be watching the official Apache resources such as the GIT / SVN / Jira, so there is pretty much no chance of anything coming back. The github branch - people would

Re: SVN vs Git

Understood, but PPMC members won't be watching the github instance -- we will only be watching the official Apache resources such as the GIT / SVN / Jira, so there is pretty much no chance of anything coming back. Discussion and code that happen outside Apache "don't happen" (that is how all apach

Re: SVN vs Git

On 14/02/2012 00:57, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: I know people have talked about making a mirror of the SVN (and soon, Git) repos on GitHub, but any changes committed to those mirrors will be orphaned. Any branch ever made in any system is by itself orphaned without constant merging. To get it

Re: SVN vs Git

Martin, Because of leagalise, we can't allow a github-style open-source project. Apache affords us a legal protection for not only contributes, but those companies that need to use the software. Because of this, all the contributes need to sign a legal agreement (the ICLA) that releases the righ

Re: SVN vs Git

On 14/02/2012 00:25, Kevin Korngut wrote: If you do a search on the list there's a post from Bertrand, "FYI, I have requested a Git mirror for Flex", it's not much of a thread so I'll repost what was said there: Git is not github. Github has indexing and community management. Different game than

Re: SVN vs Git

If you do a search on the list there's a post from Bertrand, "FYI, I have requested a Git mirror for Flex", it's not much of a thread so I'll repost what was said there: "...at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4366 - once that's setup, the mirror(s) will be listed at git.apache.org (see

Re: SVN vs Git

On 13/02/2012 11:21, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: Github is not going to happen (for a variety of reasons)... There is a difference between deployment/storing at github and working with github. If there is a github directory in sync (by some polling mechanism) with the svn of apache then people

Re: SVN vs Git

That's great news, really. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > Dwayne, > > Github is not going to happen (for a variety of reasons), but the > infastrcture team at Apache is experimenting with GIT. For the short-term, > we will be on SVN, but I know there are q

Re: SVN vs Git

Dwayne, Github is not going to happen (for a variety of reasons), but the infastrcture team at Apache is experimenting with GIT. For the short-term, we will be on SVN, but I know there are quite a few people that are looking forward to using GIT vs. SVN. -Nick On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, D