I hadn't realised that was the way things worked. I'd assumed (wrongly) that it was hard to become a committer. I hadn't realised that when I start submitting patches, it would almost be expected that I become one :)
David. ----- Reply message ----- From: "Greg Reddin" <gred...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 13, 2012 17:53 Subject: SVN vs Git To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:08 AM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > We may well want to undertake > some big changes, involving lots of people who aren't committers. There's a little problem with statements like this that we need to be careful about. If we get involved in doing lots of work that is involving lots of non-committers then we need to start adding these people as committers. As soon as someone starts contributing work on a consistent basis we need to invite them to become a committer. We should not have long, drawn-out efforts of work involving a lot of people who are not committers. We should instead have a growing community, adding committers on a regular basis. Greg
