Hi,
Original Message
> From: "Alex Harui"
> > but my question is this: If I am using Flash Builder 4.6, what will i
need to
> > do to compile the sdk for use in testing?
> For testing changes to the compiler or the SDK or your apps? The
compiler
> code is in Java and has Ecl
On 4/12/12 11:18 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> On 4/12/12 3:46 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
>> wrote:
>>> ...I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin
>>> acceptance
>>> tests. Hopeful to have something soon.
>
>>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> On 4/12/12 3:46 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
> wrote:
>> ...I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin acceptance
>> tests. Hopeful to have something soon.
> Tamarin is MPL isn't it? If so be careful about how you depend on
Hi,
> As of today, there should be no difference between the Apache MXMLC and the
> Adobe MXMLC, so in theory you can open the Apache Flex Framework projects in
> FB and point to either compiler.
Unless you've changed it yourself :-) For Flex projects I believe (but not 100%
sure) it uses the com
On 4/12/12 4:12 PM, "David Coleman" wrote:
>
>
>> For testing changes to the compiler or the SDK or your apps? The compiler
>> code is in Java and has Eclipse projects. There are no compiler unit tests
>> at this time.
>
> Well, Alex, I would say for testing the SDK and the apps, and of c
On 4/12/12 3:46 PM, "Michael A. Labriola"
wrote:
>> It would obviously be better to have unit tests, but if the compiler can
>> compile the framework and pass the framework tests, it can't be too broken.
>
> I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin acceptance
> tests. H
> For testing changes to the compiler or the SDK or your apps? The compiler
> code is in Java and has Eclipse projects. There are no compiler unit tests
> at this time.
Well, Alex, I would say for testing the SDK and the apps, and of course the
compiler would probably be a necessity for using
>It would obviously be better to have unit tests, but if the compiler can
>compile the framework and pass the framework tests, it can't be too broken.
I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin acceptance
tests. Hopeful to have something soon.
Mike
I should take to begin working with this framework that may not
> be automatically detected by the IDE?
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:34:56 +0900
>> Subject: Re: MXMLC now in trunk
>> From: pepe.f...@gmail.com
>> To: flex-dev@incuba
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
> It would obviously be better to have unit tests, but if the compiler can
> compile the framework and pass the framework tests, it can't be too broken.
>
> Gordon Smith, Adobe
If we had the framework tests then it could be a stop gap. Hopef
PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: MXMLC now in trunk
Alex already said that there will be no unit tests commited to Apache flex ...
gotta do em ourselves ...
yours
Martin.
On 12/04/2012 08:32, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Great news. BTW It compiles and seems to wo
On 4/12/12 5:34 AM, "pepe.f...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi, Alex
>
> Is it here?
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/fl
> ex2/compiler/mxml/
>
It is just about everything in modules folder
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.ado
gular flex sdk, but I'm realizing that maybe I should ask if there are any
special steps I should take to begin working with this framework that may not
be automatically detected by the IDE?
Thanks for your time!
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:34:56 +0900
> Subject: Re: MXMLC now in trun
Hi, Alex
Is it here?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/
thanks
Shigeru Nakagaki
2012/4/12 Alex Harui :
> Infra was kind enough to import it last night. I’m still verifying it, but
> so far, it looks good. Feel free to take a loo
Alex already said that there will be no unit tests commited to Apache
flex ... gotta do em ourselves ...
yours
Martin.
On 12/04/2012 08:32, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Great news. BTW It compiles and seems to work fine on OSX.
I've noticed there doesn't seem to be a lot of unit test which pote
Hi,
Great news. BTW It compiles and seems to work fine on OSX.
I've noticed there doesn't seem to be a lot of unit test which potentially may
make making/submitting any changes to the compiler difficult.
Are tests coming in a future code release from Adobe (ie with Mustella) or do
we need to
Hello Alex,
that's very good news! How do you go on from here?
yours
Martin.
On 12/04/2012 04:28, Joan Llenas Masó wrote:
Awesome,
thanx!
--
Joan Llenas Masó
--
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
http://joan.garnet.io
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 20:14, Omar Gonzalezwrote:
On Wednesday, Apri
Awesome,
thanx!
--
Joan Llenas Masó
--
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
http://joan.garnet.io
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 20:14, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 11, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > Infra was kind enough to import it last night. I’m still verifying it,
> > but so far, i
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012, Alex Harui wrote:
> Infra was kind enough to import it last night. I’m still verifying it,
> but so far, it looks good. Feel free to take a look. I think the next
> step is to move a few files from Carol’ whiteboard and see if it will build.
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> F
19 matches
Mail list logo
