On 4/12/12 11:18 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> On 4/12/12 3:46 PM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net>
>> wrote:
>>> ...I am working on building a set of basic tests using the tamarin
>>> acceptance
>>> tests. Hopeful to have something soon.
>
>> Tamarin is MPL isn't it? If so be careful about how you depend on it...
>
> See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html for details - binary MPL
> dependencies are ok.
I'm still trying to understand this. Based on my reading and recent
discussions, MPL binaries should not be checked into the trunk and should
not be downloaded by the source package build script unless the user is
first given a choice, and therefore can only be used for optional features.
If I got that right, would running compiler tests be considered optional?
Currently, playerglobal.swc is under MPL but is required and currently
downloaded by the build script without a choice to opt-out (because nothing
would build without it).
Could playerglobal.swc be a "pre-requisite" like Java? Java is required to
compile the compiler source.
I think the link does indicate that playerglobal.swc can be put in a
convenience binary distribution. Is that right?
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
