Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Just uploading to the SVN is not enough to make it go on the staging server -- you still have to run the update script. Either way, I'll push it to production now. Thanks! -Nick On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Did you push those changes in the CMS? > No I was waiting

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Justin Mclean
> Did you push those changes in the CMS? No I was waiting for it to reviewed mirrors to mostly have the new files. If you've not done so you can publish it. Thanks Justin

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
4.9 is officially a release. We are just waiting for the files to propagate all the distribution sites. -Nick On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Om wrote: > Please do not make any changes to the installer config. I plan to create a > new version of the config xml for v2. The new config changes

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Om
Please do not make any changes to the installer config. I plan to create a new version of the config xml for v2. The new config changes will break the installer v1 and we don't want that. The badge would also have to be updated to look for the new config xml. The plan is to wait for 4.9 to be pr

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Alex Harui
The xml file for the installer will need to be changed then we will need a separate vote on its release. I think we need to hold off on its release until we get our TLP dist folder. We could release twice (sooner for the incubator URL) and again when we get our dist folder, but I'm hoping that we

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Erik de Bruin
Yes, I believe there was. But to my knowledge the 'interface' in the XML file hasn't been altered, so the change I indicated will need to implemented anyway. EdB On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > ok. Was there a new version of the installer that was being produced

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
ok. Was there a new version of the installer that was being produced? I thought I remember one being worked on (although, I'd admit I wasn't paying very good attention to it). -Nick On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > In sdk-installer-config.xml the line: > > path="incuba

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Erik de Bruin
In sdk-installer-config.xml the line: Needs to be updated to point to the latest SDK. That should be enough to update both the Installer and InstallerBadge functionality. EdB On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > But otherwise -- it looks good to me. I made a few q

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
But otherwise -- it looks good to me. I made a few quick changes on the index to add the date of the release. I'm showing that about 90% of the dists have the images now. From experience, it took the full 24 hours for all of them to get it. We should publish the pages then. Do you know if the

Re: Apache Flex 4.9 release on web site

2012-12-27 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Did you push those changes in the CMS? I don't see them on the staging server yet. I do see them in SVN, though. I can take care of that for you, if you wish. -Nick On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I've added some information to the web site for the 4.9 release,