x-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Interesting I don't knwo but weird, to get the console log, I just re-run
the failed tests and the spark/core/fxg/properties passed and now I have a
bad image for the gumbo/components/Image/styles
I don't understand what
lex Harui
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 5:21 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Interesting. Does the console output give the full path to where it wrote
the bad.png files? Are you sure you're in the right source branch
(release4.9 vs develop)
Alex Harui
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 5:11 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Maybe I don't understand. If you use imageDiffAIR it can't find any bad
> images? Are you looking in the right folders?
&
PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Maybe I don't understand. If you use imageDiffAIR it can't find any bad
images? Are you looking in the right folders?
On 12/22/12 7:48 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
Hi Alex,
Player
m: Alex Harui
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:32 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Those will have to wait until we get the display list compare feature
> checked in after the release. Player is choosing different pixel valu
Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:32 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Those will have to wait until we get the display list compare feature
checked in after the release. Player is choosing
weird is that I haven't got any bad images and
> the tests failed comparing images, how that's possible ?
>
>
> - Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-----
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 2:34 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 2:34 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
closed
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 7:53 PM
To: flex-dev@in
closed
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 7:53 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
It passed on my Mac, so I think it is ok to close.
On 12/21/12 2:17 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote
s://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33323
>
> Thanks,
> Fred
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 8:09 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
riday, December 21, 2012 8:09 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/20/12 11:01 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you switch back to 11.1 and regenerate the baseline, you should be ok.
>
> OK
>
>&g
I'll commit in few hours.
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 8:09 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/20/12 11:01 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
Hi,
If you swi
On 12/20/12 11:01 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you switch back to 11.1 and regenerate the baseline, you should be ok.
>
> OK
>
>> If it turns out that it causes failures for others then just revert and
>> we'll investigate why.
>
> What did you reverted exactly ?
I haven't re
a bug from
the 11.2
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4937968#4937968
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 6:14 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
If you switch back to 11.1 and regenerate th
éric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 8:04 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Hi,
>
> I choose the second option but that's imply I can regenerate the baseline
> image
> ? (I'
r
> Gumbo_TextInput_alpha_property_01 Failed AssertMethodValue (method
> cannot be shown)(body:step 1) method returned 0, expected 0.10
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:51 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
&
] gumbo/components/TextInput/Properties/TextInput_properties_tester
> > Gumbo_TextInput_alpha_property_01 Failed AssertMethodValue (method
> cannot be
> > shown)(body:step 1) method returned 0, expected 0.10
> >
> > -Message d'origine-
> > From: Alex Harui
AssertMethodValue (method cannot be
> shown)(body:step 1) method returned 0, expected 0.10
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:51 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candida
7;origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:51 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
It appears that in more recent players:
Number(0.12345).toFixed(0)
returns "0"
But older players returns "0."
Which is
;
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine-
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 6:16 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Arff, I'm mixing everything, I shouldn't do that at 6 A
rsday, December 20, 2012 6:16 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Arff, I'm mixing everything, I shouldn't do that at 6 AM :P
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 6:13 AM
To: flex-dev
Arff, I'm mixing everything, I shouldn't do that at 6 AM :P
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 6:13 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
But it seems normal to me that the format
But it seems normal to me that the format method removes the decimal
separator when there's no decimal part.
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 6:08 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candida
Oups, that's the opposite, the expected is "0." and the result is "0".
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:52 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Hi,
I was lookin
ot with 0, it's at least what's the fail tests
shown, do you agree, same for you ?
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 5:42 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
I am not getting the B
bol_valid_script_test16
> Failed AssertMethodValue (method cannot be shown)(body:step 3) method
> returned CNY0, expected CNY0.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Carol Frampton
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:30 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator
mat_Main_tester
CF_Fallback_format_currencyISOCode_CNY_currencySymbol_valid_script_test16
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:10 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/19/12 11 :05AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
Runn
riginal Message-
From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 6:14 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
I was running on 11.2... I've downloaded 11.5 and those are still failing
(though the imagediffs are som
al Message-
> > From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:03 AM
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm gonna try to m
Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:03 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm gonna try to manage that.
>
> Thanks,
> Fred.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...
Hi,
I'm gonna try to manage that.
Thanks,
Fred.
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:44 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/19/12 11 :40AM, "Frédé
:jbal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:48 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
I was loooking at them just now (pretty cool, by the way! ;)).
For the spark test, it shows one square near the bottom... I'd say that it
corresponds
to look at the
> bitmap differences ?
>
> - Fred
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbal...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:26 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Hi,
t
is never dispatched the timeout doesn't matter.
Carol
>
>Thanks,
>Fred.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:31 PM
>To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Relea
l_valid_script_tes
> t16
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:10 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
>
>
> On 12/19/12 1
, BTW, I didn't know it outputs
the timeouts as results).
Thanks,
Fred.
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:31 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Then if the
_currencySymbol_default_script_t
>est15
>spark/formatters/CurrencyFormatter/Fallback/CF_Fallback_format_Main_tester
> CF_Fallback_format_currencyISOCode_CNY_currencySymbol_valid_script_test16
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:10 PM
&g
>id=CF_Fallback_format_currencyISOCode_default_currencySymbol_default_sc
> >rip
> >t_test15 result=fail elapsed=171 phase=body started=1355932297072
> >extraInfo=null msg=AssertMethodValue (method cannot be shown)(body:step
> >3) method returned USD0, expected USD0.
> &g
Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:10 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/19/12 11 :05AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>Running Mustella tests on the develop br
esult=fail elapsed=253 phase=body started=1355932297290
>extraInfo=null msg=AssertMethodValue (method cannot be shown)(body:step
>3) method returned CNY0, expected CNY0.
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012
dnesday, December 19, 2012 8:26 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 11:19 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> BTW, "Avertissement" means Warning.
Yup, BabelFish is amazing. I learned someth
On 12/18/12 11:19 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> BTW, "Avertissement" means Warning.
Yup, BabelFish is amazing. I learned something today!
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Hi Alex,
BTW, "Avertissement" means Warning.
- Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:23 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 10:15 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS&qu
ng English locales.
I hope more people and from everywhere gonna use mustella.
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:44 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 10:33 PM, &
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/12 10:37 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>
> > Well, we just enabled checkintests on Jenkins...
> Yeah, but it will run in english, so his fix is not required.
>
>
Got it. Missed that part.
On 12/18/12 10:37 PM, "Om" wrote:
> Well, we just enabled checkintests on Jenkins...
Yeah, but it will run in english, so his fix is not required.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
un the tests after checking a patch in
> and at the minimum the checkintests ?
Sure they are, but most folks are apparently using English locales.
>
> - Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:23 AM
> To: flex-dev@
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/12 10:15 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Adding "else if (s.startsWith("Avertissement"))" to the
> > MustellaResultsParser.java makes the checkintests pass, thanks Alex,
> where
> > am I suppose to check in that,
ks are not suppose to run the tests after checking a patch in
and at the minimum the checkintests ?
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:23 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12
On 12/18/12 10:15 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Adding "else if (s.startsWith("Avertissement"))" to the
> MustellaResultsParser.java makes the checkintests pass, thanks Alex, where
> am I suppose to check in that, in the develop or releaze4.9 branch ?
The release4.9 branch, then merg
On 12/18/12 10:04 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I guess I got it in part, the patch relative to the internationalized
> Mustella test suite hadn't been included into this branch and because my OS
> is in french, many tests fail.
> I'm gonna check the other points.
>
You might wa
tests,
so, I didn't noticed but it is an issue for the internationalized version of
the Mustella test suite IMO.
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:04 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release
ic THOMAS
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:18 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
but the resultsparser is also looking for trace statements unintentionally
left
in the code. I just used BabelFish to translat the output to English and
saw that it w
special day at work, I'm gonna try to get time to do it.
And thanks again Alex,
Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 6:47 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 9:28 AM, "F
On 12/18/12 2:05 PM, "Om" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Which is useful, but somewhat disturbing information as it
>>> potentially increases the number of possible rendering environments.
>>
>> I don't think we can possible test every comb
On 12/18/12 1:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Which is useful, but somewhat disturbing information as it
>> potentially increases the number of possible rendering environments.
>
> I don't think we can possible test every combination here that's:
> OS version (at least 2) x compile
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Which is useful, but somewhat disturbing information as it
> > potentially increases the number of possible rendering environments.
>
> I don't think we can possible test every combination here that's:
> OS version (at least 2) x c
Hi,
> Which is useful, but somewhat disturbing information as it
> potentially increases the number of possible rendering environments.
I don't think we can possible test every combination here that's:
OS version (at least 2) x compile for FP (x8) x run in FP versions (x8) x
supported locales (
On 12/18/12 10:11 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> I followed the directions posted on the wiki. I edited the
> build.properties and made sure the correct player swc was available. Is
> there something else we should be doing?
If you are moving to a newer player version than 11.1, I think
I followed the directions posted on the wiki. I edited the
build.properties and made sure the correct player swc was available. Is
there something else we should be doing?
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/18/12 5:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
> > Hi
On 12/17/12 7 :10PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Ok. Compiling is easy and quick.
>About 20 min or so by my count and the check in tests only take a few
>minutes to run.
>
>Just add your name to the wiki page to the version you are testing so we
>don't get everyone running the same tests.
On 12/18/12 9:38 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>> If you have already done that and have 136 failures that won't go away,
> then we need your help diagnosing why that might be. There might be some
> configuration issue or tests may need adjusting in some other way.
>
> I'm gonna analyze wh
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 6:11 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
>
>
>
> On 12/18/12 7:49 AM, "Carol Frampton&quo
Are you using Mac or Win?
Only windows.
Thanks
Fred.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 6:24 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 7:17 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS"
On 12/18/12 5:58 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I did not. Theory is you shouldn't have to unless you broke something :)
>
> Yes Nick, I knew it, Alex explained me that too, the thing is when I ran the
> Mustella tests something like 2/3 months ago, I ran into image compare
> diffs
incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 7:49 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand why you are annoyed.
>
> It looks like checkintests did what it was supposed to do. It
> detecte
On 12/18/12 7:17 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a little annoyed now, what I did not do well ?
It is rare for mustella -all to run without failures. Some tests are still
a bit flaky. If I get failures, I then use "mustella -failures -rerun" and
see how many failures are left, an
>
> On 12/18/12 10 :17AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a little annoyed now, what I did not do well ?
>>
>> - Fred.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
&
/Compiling+Apache+Flex+for+d
ifferent+Locales+and+different+versions+of+the+Flash+Player
-Original Message-
From: Carol Frampton [mailto:cfram...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:50 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Hi,
I'
On 12/18/12 10 :07AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>You are correct -- I don't have a command-line SVN client in my path.
>
>Do you expect any ill effects if it fails?
I just unraveled the build file. It was using the revision number it
found by doing an svn info --xml on something to append
nnoyed now, what I did not do well ?
>
>- Fred.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:48 PM
>To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
>R
Hi,
I'm a little annoyed now, what I did not do well ?
- Fred.
-Original Message-
From: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:48 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Running Mustella
You are correct -- I don't have a command-line SVN client in my path.
Do you expect any ill effects if it fails?
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 12/18/12 7 :46AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
On 12/18/12 7 :46AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>
>On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
>wrote:
>
>> echo
>> == Apache Batik 1.7 build file
>> echo
>>
>> echo
>> JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOME}
>> echo
>> VM: 20.6-b01,
Running Mustella tests on the release4.9 branch - FP11.4 / AIR3.4 / en_US
1- ant -> build success
2- ant other.locales -> build success
3- ant checkintests -> fail [1]
4- sh mini_run.sh -all -> Fails: 136 [2]
(There are a lot of image compare errors)
- Fred
[1]
[mxmlc] Loading configuration
Wiki updated.
EdB
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Om,
>
> You can mark that the check-in tests pass for mine too. Technically it
> compiles, but I'm waiting on an answer about the batik errors I was getting.
>
> You can also put me down for testing 11.3 and 11.5.
On 12/17/12 7 :10PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Ok. Compiling is easy and quick.
>About 20 min or so by my count and the check in tests only take a few
>minutes to run.
>
>Just add your name to the wiki page to the version you are testing so we
>don't get everyone running the same tests.
>
Om,
You can mark that the check-in tests pass for mine too. Technically it
compiles, but I'm waiting on an answer about the batik errors I was getting.
You can also put me down for testing 11.3 and 11.5. I'll throw them on my
CI server while I'm at work so we can get the full Mustella tests on
Yeah, there were a lot of issues with the images earlier. I think they got
cleaned up a week or two ago. Everything should run clean now ;)
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I did not. Theory is you shouldn't have to unless you broke something :)
>
> Ye
Hi,
> I did not. Theory is you shouldn't have to unless you broke something :)
Yes Nick, I knew it, Alex explained me that too, the thing is when I ran the
Mustella tests something like 2/3 months ago, I ran into image compare
diffs, so, I'm happy to know they passed now as I was a bit worried i
las Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:46 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
>
> Just as a note to add to the WIKI... 10.2 and 10.3 passed Mustella for
> en_US.
>
> -Nick
>
@Nick,
Just to know, did you have to regenerate some images or not ?
- Fred
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:46 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Just as a
Added to Wiki.
EdB
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> Just as a note to add to the WIKI... 10.2 and 10.3 passed Mustella for
> en_US.
>
> -Nick
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> wrote:
>
>> echo
>> == Apache Batik 1.7 build file
Just as a note to add to the WIKI... 10.2 and 10.3 passed Mustella for
en_US.
-Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> echo
> == Apache Batik 1.7 build file
> echo
>
> echo
> JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOME}
> echo
> VM:
echo
== Apache Batik 1.7 build file
echo
echo
JAVA_HOME: ${env.JAVA_HOME}
echo
VM: 20.6-b01, Sun Microsystems Inc.
echo
javac.source:1.6
echo
javac.target:1.6
property
compile-prepare
mkdir
Created dir: E:\Apache\develop\
Arff, not awake, switching on the release4.9 branch.
- Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 7:34 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
Hi,
I'm compiling and testing against the deve
6:14 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
I'm confused. When are you getting that error? What precedes that in the
console?
On 12/17/12 9:12 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
Been running it off
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex
I'm confused. When are you getting that error? What precedes that in the
console?
On 12/17/12 9:12 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Been running it off
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9,
> and did a super-clean.
>
> I'm getting the same errors when
Been running it off
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9,
and did a super-clean.
I'm getting the same errors when building with the 1.6 JDK for 10.2, 10.3
and 11.1. SWCs seem to be generating fine, but I haven't run them against
mustella just yet. I'll be runni
Hi,
> I tried running the tests for 10.2. We have some errors with batik -- not
> sure if it supposed to fail or not
Were you running off the release branch?
Justin
I tried running the tests for 10.2. We have some errors with batik -- not
sure if it supposed to fail or not :
Execute failed: java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "svn" (in directory
"E:\Apache\develop\modules\thirdparty\batik"): CreateProcess error=2, The
system cannot find the file specifie
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I can't avoid it any longer ;P
Karma always gets you in the end ;-)
I can update the wiki for you in the meantime.
Om
I'm pulling down the changes to my ci server at the moment... I'll also
need somebody to give me wiki karma so I can update the wiki too... I
guess I can't avoid it any longer ;P
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Ok. Compiling is easy and quick.
> About 20
Hi,
> Ok. Compiling is easy and quick.
About 20 min or so by my count and the check in tests only take a few minutes
to run.
Just add your name to the wiki page to the version you are testing so we don't
get everyone running the same tests.
https://cwiki.apache.org/FLEX/compiling-apache-flex-
Ok. Compiling is easy and quick. The full mustella tests take a LONG time.
I can help run some of those overnight (for Windows).
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Are we just doing compiling, or are we running it through Mustella too?
>
> Whatever you can
Hi,
> Are we just doing compiling, or are we running it through Mustella too?
Whatever you can help with, if you compile it at least run the checkin tests.
We need Mustella to pass for 11.1/en_US on OSX and windows at the very least
before we make a release.
Thanks,
Justin
Are we just doing compiling, or are we running it through Mustella too?
-Nick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Om wrote:
> Perfect! Thanks for this. I have updated the page with assignments. I
> will start a new thread calling for folks to help with the testing.
>
> Om
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 20
Perfect! Thanks for this. I have updated the page with assignments. I
will start a new thread calling for folks to help with the testing.
Om
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Sorry to do this, but can you please post a wiki page with detailed
> > instructions (
Hi,
> Sorry to do this, but can you please post a wiki page with detailed
> instructions (like I am a 5 year old)? Its hard to follow this thread :-)
Here you go:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Compiling+Apache+Flex+for+different+Locales+and+different+versions+of+the+Flash+Play
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Justin - If I understand what you did a while back, after changing those
> > properties don't you have to rebuild frameworks so that the flex-config
> > target in frameworks/build.xml fixes up the playerversion, swfversion and
> > l
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
