Hi,
I think you have to check in in one branch (preferably release) and merge
to
the other. Checking in the same fix separately may make the final merge
harder.
Oups, too late, I did it for both (it's not my used but it's done :P )
Sure they are, but most folks are apparently using English locales.
I hope more people and from everywhere gonna use mustella.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:44 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 10:33 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently running the tests against the develop branch.
I'll check the MustellaResultsParser.java in the develop and release4.9 in
few minutes.
I think you have to check in in one branch (preferably release) and merge to
the other. Checking in the same fix separately may make the final merge
harder.
Itsort of depends on how many folks you think will run checkintests
against
the develop branch in the near future.
Usually, folks are not suppose to run the tests after checking a patch in
and at the minimum the checkintests ?
Sure they are, but most folks are apparently using English locales.
- Fred
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:23 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Flex 4.9 Release Candidate 3
On 12/18/12 10:15 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Adding "else if (s.startsWith("Avertissement"))" to the
MustellaResultsParser.java makes the checkintests pass, thanks Alex,
where
am I suppose to check in that, in the develop or releaze4.9 branch ?
The release4.9 branch, then merge it back to the develop branch if you
have
time. We'll do a giant merge after releasing if you don't have time. It
sort of depends on how many folks you think will run checkintests against
the develop branch in the near future.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
