Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen

2012-01-11 Thread Samuel Janzen
I don't think that there is too much similarity with the vmvare logo neither. But still an important concern, to keep uniqueness in mind... 2012/1/11 Dirk Eismann > nice, Samuel. I still like the initial version best (#4 is also nice > btw, fresh color) > > It's not that similar to the VMWare Pl

Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen

2012-01-11 Thread Dirk Eismann
nice, Samuel. I still like the initial version best (#4 is also nice btw, fresh color) It's not that similar to the VMWare Player logo anymore if you look at the "pure" logo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VMware_Player_logo.png The VMWare logo consists of 3 arrows and an arc / corner plus it

Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen

2012-01-11 Thread Jeffry Houser
I personally like Variation 1 best; however I have concerns--which I think others have voiced about the similarity to a VMWare logo ( http://www.vmwarez.com/uploaded_images/playercap3-777309.gif ). On 1/11/2012 9:54 AM, Samuel Janzen wrote: Find below the UPDATED logo overview with four dif

Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen

2012-01-11 Thread Rui Silva
+1 on variation #2 - dynamic and growth Original Message > From: "Paul Evans" > Sent: quarta-feira, 11 de Janeiro de 2012 15:00 > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen > > I prefer variation #2 - dynamic arrows

Re: [LOGO] Samuel Janzen

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Evans
I prefer variation #2 - dynamic arrows