On 1/18/2012 3:00 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
I think the +1/0/-1 only really works in an either/or decision.
It is kind of an either or decision. Or rather, 54 of them. ;)
I respect the amount of time it takes to vote in each entry
individually, though.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Ent
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> I'd be willing to use this approach, and like it better than the "pick
> five". Although looking at the logos; there are some I like; some I'm
> indifferent to; and some I really don't like. By only +1ing; I'm only
> voting a third of my o
On 1/18/2012 2:40 PM, Doug Arthur wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think there
are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort of
vote. +1, 0, -1 works really well for an all o
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> I don't think doubling on the PPMC's votes, or reducing the non-PPMC's to 1
> point would be necessary. The community would vote with the same weight as
> the PPMC's and if there is a significant difference we should analyze that
> and decide
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think
> there are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort
> of vote. +1, 0, -1 works really well for an all or nothing selection, but as
> soon as
Am 18.01.2012 um 20:11 schrieb Iwo Banaś:
> Opening voting to the public can only lead to the "who has more friends"
> kind of competition and "how many votes from one IP are allowed"
As I mentioned in a previous mail: Maybe we send a "start voting mail" and they
only have to REPLY this mail.
> From: "João Saleiro"
>
> I suggest the following.
>
> 1- The voting is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are worth the double
> 2- A page is setup with all logos, with a # for each logo
> 3- A new unique thread is created for voting
> 4- Each person can distribute 5 points in the following way:
>
> From: "João Fernandes"
> I don't see the point of doing -1 on logos with that many entries.
>
> João Fernandes
I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think there
are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort of
vote. +1, 0, -1 works real
I suggest the following.
1- The voting is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are worth the double
2- A page is setup with all logos, with a # for each logo
3- A new unique thread is created for voting
4- Each person can distribute 5 points in the following way:
Logo #6 - 3
Logo #9 - 1
Logo #8 - 1
On Jan 18, 2012 6:17 PM, "Brent Arnold" wrote:
> So is the rest of the community unable to vote? Seeing how we didn't
elect the PPMC members, I don't see it being very fair to exclude the rest
of us from voting on something that will represent the community.
Surely it won't be "fair" but I can't
I don't see the point of doing -1 on logos with that many entries.
What I propose is:
PPMC votes:
(Binding)
Logo #xx : x points
Logo #yy: y points
... up to 5 points.
Community vote:
(Non-Binding)
Logo #xx : 1 point
xx/yy being the Logo entry at
http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.htm
Another approach could be...
1. We determine how many finalists are going to be chosen from this round.
2. Everyone's votes are counted for this round to determine the finalists.
3. The designers will have some time (TBD) to gather feedback and update
their designs.
4. Another vote will be held
Apache already has a voting process, and I suggest we use that for
choosing the logo.
I know a few people expressed worry about offending designers by
giving them a -1 vote--but they did enter a design contest and I am
comfortable judging them.
I would advocate this approach:
1) Put to
> From: "Jonathan Campos"
> Should people have to at least vote for 2 or 3 different logos. It may
be
> possible that everyone votes for a different logo and every logo gets 5
pts.
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
I'd leave people free to vote in any way they want.
Rui
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Brent Arnold wrote:
> So is the rest of the community unable to vote?
It's been discussed several ways, but not sure we have any consensus
on how that should work. IMO, community members may cast their vote
(non binding). This can help PPMC members decide on votes
So is the rest of the community unable to vote? Seeing how we didn't
elect the PPMC members, I don't see it being very fair to exclude the
rest of us from voting on something that will represent the community.
2 cents,
Brent
On 1/18/12 11:14 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
Hi people,
We should decide
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> 3. Each voter will have 5 points to freely distribute by the logo
> submissions. Voters would simply append the points they attribute to a logo
>
> bellow its URL;
>
Should people have to at least vote for 2 or 3 different logos. It may be
pos
17 matches
Mail list logo
