For this type of output you may want to checkout the pre existing compiler
option -link-report=AFileName.xml
On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Erik Lundgren wrote:
> That sounds really cool.
>
> Some simple structure to start with ...
>
> somePackage
> - - qualifies SomeType
> - - - which is a Sup
Sounds great!
If you could output xml it would be great.
/E.
1 okt 2012 kl. 12.32 skrev Michael Schmalle:
> I'm working on a documentor framework right now that uses output target
> renderers. This will be a perfect prototype experiment for an output type.
>
> Give me a bit of time and I can
Quoting Roland Zwaga :
So yes, if you can image a fully parsed source list with all the trimmings
sitting in a class that has an API;
Collection<**IFunctionDefinition> getFunctions(ITypeDefinition definition,
String visibility, boolean inherit);
Collection getSubClasses(IClassDef
>
>
> So yes, if you can image a fully parsed source list with all the trimmings
> sitting in a class that has an API;
>
> Collection<**IFunctionDefinition> getFunctions(ITypeDefinition definition,
> String visibility, boolean inherit);
>
> Collection getSubClasses(IClassDefinition defi
Quoting Roland Zwaga :
Hey Mike,
do you think your framework could also form a basis for static analysis
tools such as FlexPMD/CPD et al? If the parsing is so much faster than
perhaps these existing
tools could be re-written to use the new compiler. I myself know absolutely
nothing about stat
>
> Yeah took a look at the PDF, there are some things that need to be thought
> about. I'm not really at the point where I could even begin to think about
> this part.
>
> Hopefully others might take an interest when the framework is up and could
> help contribute then.
>
> BTW the "framework" her
Ok,
Yeah took a look at the PDF, there are some things that need to be
thought about. I'm not really at the point where I could even begin to
think about this part.
Hopefully others might take an interest when the framework is up and
could help contribute then.
BTW the "framework" here
An note to others about documentation;
I would just like to state that for some reason I have a passion for
documentation, maybe it's that manuals or schematics give way to a
greater awareness of the underlying machine. In the case of the Flex
framework I have followed it since it's version
On 1 October 2012 13:21, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Quoting Roland Zwaga :
>
>
>
>> Perhaps it would be an idea to output UML? Or would this be overkill?
>>
>>
>
> Well Roland, spitting out UML would be as easy as knowing what to spit
> out. :) Is there an UML-XML spec somewhere for existing edito
Quoting Roland Zwaga :
Perhaps it would be an idea to output UML? Or would this be overkill?
Well Roland, spitting out UML would be as easy as knowing what to spit
out. :) Is there an UML-XML spec somewhere for existing editors to be
able to load? I have used StarUML for years, so I am
I'm working on a documentor framework right now that uses output target
renderers. This will be a perfect prototype experiment for an output type.
>
> Give me a bit of time and I can get this stable as I have said in some
> previous posts. I'll add the initial code to my whiteboard and we can go
>
I'm working on a documentor framework right now that uses output
target renderers. This will be a perfect prototype experiment for an
output type.
Give me a bit of time and I can get this stable as I have said in some
previous posts. I'll add the initial code to my whiteboard and we can
g
That sounds really cool.
Some simple structure to start with ...
somePackage
- - qualifies SomeType
- - - which is a SuperTypeA, an ITypeB and an ITypeC
- - - which is publicly (public, internal, protected, custom namespace)
associated with TypeE, F and G
- - - wich is privately (private) associ
Wow, I'm over thinking things here. I guess I just want some more
experiments with the compiler. I was just thinking grabbing AST would
give an immense freedom of the types of things you wanted like
members, metadata, comments etc.
Gordon, I still can't gt over how fast that code is.
Mike
The catalog.xml file inside each SWC file (framework.swc, spark.swc, etc.) has
an XML encoding of the direct dependencies of each class in the SWC.
- Gordon Smith, Adobe
-Original Message-
From: Erik Lundgren [mailto:e...@lndgrn.se]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:39 AM
To: flex-dev
I have been working with the new compiler and all I can say is this
would be something very easy to create if I knew what type of "graph"
you wanted and the schema of such graph.
Let me know some details if interested in creating something that
would actually make it. (meaning I could write
16 matches
Mail list logo
