Logo contest" ).
I think the results will be posted after the vote finished.
Thanks!
Marcus
Am 19.01.2012 um 12:45 schrieb Denis Kristianto (Google Documents):
> Permintaan berbagi
> Anda adalah pemilik Apache Flex Logo Voting Results.
> deniskristia...@gmail.com telah meminta
On 1/18/2012 3:00 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
I think the +1/0/-1 only really works in an either/or decision.
It is kind of an either or decision. Or rather, 54 of them. ;)
I respect the amount of time it takes to vote in each entry
individually, though.
--
Jeffry Houser
Technical Ent
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> I'd be willing to use this approach, and like it better than the "pick
> five". Although looking at the logos; there are some I like; some I'm
> indifferent to; and some I really don't like. By only +1ing; I'm only
> voting a third of my o
On 1/18/2012 2:40 PM, Doug Arthur wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think there
are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort of
vote. +1, 0, -1 works really well for an all o
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> I don't think doubling on the PPMC's votes, or reducing the non-PPMC's to 1
> point would be necessary. The community would vote with the same weight as
> the PPMC's and if there is a significant difference we should analyze that
> and decide
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think
> there are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort
> of vote. +1, 0, -1 works really well for an all or nothing selection, but as
> soon as
Am 18.01.2012 um 20:11 schrieb Iwo Banaś:
> Opening voting to the public can only lead to the "who has more friends"
> kind of competition and "how many votes from one IP are allowed"
As I mentioned in a previous mail: Maybe we send a "start voting mail" and they
only have to REPLY this mail.
> From: "João Saleiro"
>
> I suggest the following.
>
> 1- The voting is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are worth the double
> 2- A page is setup with all logos, with a # for each logo
> 3- A new unique thread is created for voting
> 4- Each person can distribute 5 points in the following way:
>
> From: "João Fernandes"
> I don't see the point of doing -1 on logos with that many entries.
>
> João Fernandes
I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think there
are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort of
vote. +1, 0, -1 works real
I suggest the following.
1- The voting is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are worth the double
2- A page is setup with all logos, with a # for each logo
3- A new unique thread is created for voting
4- Each person can distribute 5 points in the following way:
Logo #6 - 3
Logo #9 - 1
Logo #8 - 1
On Jan 18, 2012 6:17 PM, "Brent Arnold" wrote:
> So is the rest of the community unable to vote? Seeing how we didn't
elect the PPMC members, I don't see it being very fair to exclude the rest
of us from voting on something that will represent the community.
Surely it won't be "fair" but I can't
I don't see the point of doing -1 on logos with that many entries.
What I propose is:
PPMC votes:
(Binding)
Logo #xx : x points
Logo #yy: y points
... up to 5 points.
Community vote:
(Non-Binding)
Logo #xx : 1 point
xx/yy being the Logo entry at
http://incubator.apache.org/flex/logo-contest.htm
Another approach could be...
1. We determine how many finalists are going to be chosen from this round.
2. Everyone's votes are counted for this round to determine the finalists.
3. The designers will have some time (TBD) to gather feedback and update
their designs.
4. Another vote will be held
Apache already has a voting process, and I suggest we use that for
choosing the logo.
I know a few people expressed worry about offending designers by
giving them a -1 vote--but they did enter a design contest and I am
comfortable judging them.
I would advocate this approach:
1) Put to
> From: "Jonathan Campos"
> Should people have to at least vote for 2 or 3 different logos. It may
be
> possible that everyone votes for a different logo and every logo gets 5
pts.
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
I'd leave people free to vote in any way they want.
Rui
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Brent Arnold wrote:
> So is the rest of the community unable to vote?
It's been discussed several ways, but not sure we have any consensus
on how that should work. IMO, community members may cast their vote
(non binding). This can help PPMC members decide on votes
So is the rest of the community unable to vote? Seeing how we didn't
elect the PPMC members, I don't see it being very fair to exclude the
rest of us from voting on something that will represent the community.
2 cents,
Brent
On 1/18/12 11:14 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
Hi people,
We should decide
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Rui Silva wrote:
> 3. Each voter will have 5 points to freely distribute by the logo
> submissions. Voters would simply append the points they attribute to a logo
>
> bellow its URL;
>
Should people have to at least vote for 2 or 3 different logos. It may be
pos
Hi people,
We should decide how the actual voting should occur within this list. I had
started a vote thread earlier which I'll repeat here to start up the
discussion:
1. Email on the mailing list with a list of URLs to the logos on contest;
2. Only PPMC member's votes are counted;
3. Each vo
I know / understand what you mean. I already try to create this form (I don't
know if this is possible in Google Docs).
Marcus
Am 18.01.2012 um 16:38 schrieb Peter Elst:
>> It will be through the mailing list.
>
>
> I think it might have been discussed but trying to make our life easier -
> i
Quoting Peter Elst :
It will be through the mailing list.
I think it might have been discussed but trying to make our life easier -
its possible to set up a Google form linked to a read-only Google
spreadsheet and have submissions through the form automatically mailed to
the list.
- Peter
That would be nice!
Dany
Op 18-jan.-2012, om 16:38 heeft Peter Elst het volgende geschreven:
>> It will be through the mailing list.
>
>
> I think it might have been discussed but trying to make our life easier -
> its possible to set up a Google form linked to a read-only Google
> spreadsheet
> It will be through the mailing list.
I think it might have been discussed but trying to make our life easier -
its possible to set up a Google form linked to a read-only Google
spreadsheet and have submissions through the form automatically mailed to
the list.
- Peter
>
>
> Anonymous voting (mail sent directly to one person)
> Non-anonymous voting (mail sent to the list)
I'd say absolutely non-anonymous - if it doesn't happen on the mailinglist
it doesn't happen :)
Please lets keep votes to a single thread.
- Peter
Quoting Dany Dhondt :
Two choices:
Anonymous voting (mail sent directly to one person)
This is NOT an option, everything we do in Apache is public
Non-anonymous voting (mail sent to the list)
It will be through the mailing list.
Mike
Two choices:
Anonymous voting (mail sent directly to one person)
Non-anonymous voting (mail sent to the list)
Dany
Op 18-jan.-2012, om 16:29 heeft Dany Dhondt het volgende geschreven:
> I suggest we follow Marcus' idea. Let's wait for a 'start voting email' and
> then just reply to it.
>
>
On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Antonio,
>>>
>>> I think Bertrand was referring to the fact committers would create the
>>> shortened list of entry urls fot the vote.
>>
>> I think that the contest page should have shortened urls.
>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>
> So
Maybe only the preview URL or call it "vote url" / "vote id" (we don't want to
make it too difficult to vote).
Just in case, if someone votes for the preview file and someone votes for the
zip file (with a different URL / key).
Marcus
Am 17.01.2012 um 17:46 schrieb Michael Schmalle:
>
>>>
Antonio,
I think Bertrand was referring to the fact committers would create
the shortened list of entry urls fot the vote.
I think that the contest page should have shortened urls.
Regards,
Dave
So are you telling me to get shortened urls on that page ASAP?
Mike
On Jan 17, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Quoting Antonio Olmo Titos :
>
>>
>> On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:33 Marcus Fritze wrote:
>>> good idea, that would be ok using http://s.apache.org/
>>
>> Unfortunately, http://s.apache.org/ is "limited to Apache committers" [
>> https://blogs.a
As far as I understand, one committer can create a short URL (with a key) for
any logo. So you only have to type the short URL / key in the vote and not the
full (and very long) URL.
Marcus
Am 17.01.2012 um 17:05 schrieb Antonio Olmo Titos:
>
> On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:33 Marcus Fritze wrote:
>>
Quoting Antonio Olmo Titos :
On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:33 Marcus Fritze wrote:
good idea, that would be ok using http://s.apache.org/
Unfortunately, http://s.apache.org/ is "limited to Apache
committers" [
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/s_apache_org_uri_shortening ].
(Do I take that
On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:33 Marcus Fritze wrote:
good idea, that would be ok using http://s.apache.org/
Unfortunately, http://s.apache.org/ is "limited to Apache committers" [
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/s_apache_org_uri_shortening ].
(Do I take that only committers will vote in the l
good idea, that would be ok using http://s.apache.org/
Am 16.01.2012 um 22:22 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Marcus Fritze
> wrote:
>> ...Every logo gets his own ID (1-36) (because some creators submitted
>> multiple logos) - this ID should be in front of the lo
I think, this shouldn't be a problem to set-up a new email. But when everybody
uses the same email subject (e.g. Logo Voting), this wouldn't bother me.
(Thanks to the automatic email grouping in Mac Mail.app ;-) )
Regarding to my suggested voting system: Just to clarify, the logo with
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Marcus Fritze
wrote:
> ...Every logo gets his own ID (1-36) (because some creators submitted
> multiple logos) - this ID should be in front of the logo creator on the logo
> wiki page
IDs should be the URLs of the logos to avoid indirection - committers
can
I assume that there will be quite a few mails regarding voting. To not
"spam" the public list: How about an administrative list like
"flex-vote" for that?
yours
Martin.
Currently, afaik we have 36 logos.
Here is my suggestion:
Every logo gets his own ID (1-36) (because some creators submitted multiple
logos) - this ID should be in front of the logo creator on the logo wiki page.
Because of the amount of logos we can maybe award places from 1st to 6th and
use
> Once the logo has been voted for and chosen, wouldn't it be wise to have a
> round on fine-tuning?
yes good point, that is planned:
"The design as accepted by popular vote will be treated as a proposal that
can be tweaked and cemented into it's final published form."
There's been discussion o
Hi all,
Once the logo has been voted for and chosen, wouldn't it be wise to have a
round on fine-tuning? Logo development is quite like programming: it's details
that matter. After all, we'll be using the Apache Flex logo for years to come :)
And a second thought: how will we vote? Just one vo
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> forgot to add...
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Omar Gonzalez >wrote:
>
> > +1
>
forgot to add...
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> +1
+1
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 18:15, Rui Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following Bertrand's lead and generally agreeing with his suggestion I'd
> like to propose the following voting mechanism for the Flex Logo
> selection:
>
+1
Hi,
Following Bertrand's lead and generally agreeing with his suggestion I'd
like to propose the following voting mechanism for the Flex Logo
selection:
1. Email on the mailing list with a list of URLs to the logos on contest;
2. Only PPMC member's votes are counted;
3. Each voter will have 5 p
45 matches
Mail list logo
