The arrow is kind of a bi-product of the tilted F, which is indeed
consisting of connected bulding blocks. (There is also a "hidden" x in
there.)
Since the arrow is not the main point about the logo, making it pointing
backwards is not a very huge issue. But I am well aware of the up/right
I agree with Doug. Don't put so much value into the direction an arrow
is pointing. It's a valid point in some cases but not necessarily an
overriding issue in every case.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Doug McCune wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about the direction of the "arrow", I think this logo
Although it should be noted that I don't have a vote, and the person
criticizing does... so umm, do what you will
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Doug McCune wrote:
> I wouldn't worry about the direction of the "arrow", I think this logo
> looks good as if, it implies both a Tetris-style buildi
I wouldn't worry about the direction of the "arrow", I think this logo
looks good as if, it implies both a Tetris-style building block, as well as
a lego-style composition of smaller components into a larger whole.
Secondarily it can be seen as a left-pointing arrow, but I don't think
that's the ov
I kind of like your stylized "F" 8 bit spaceship thing...
However--and I feel like a broken record at this point--arrows that
point to the left or down are generally considered to have negative
connotation (at least in the US). We want onward (to the right) and
upward (up); not backward (t
PNG: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~mendoza/bilder/flex.png
Assets: http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~mendoza/bilder/flex.svg
--
Sendt med Operas revolusjonerende e-postprogram: http://www.opera.com/mail/
