On 12/21/12 12 :08PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Don't you still need a class to have the name Spacer in ActionScript? I
>think the manifest trick only works in MXML.
>
True.
Carol
>
>On 12/21/12 9:05 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>> I'm not commenting on whether or not there should be a s:Spacer
Don't you still need a class to have the name Spacer in ActionScript? I
think the manifest trick only works in MXML.
On 12/21/12 9:05 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> I'm not commenting on whether or not there should be a s:Spacer but you
> don't need a new class - you just need a new manifest en
I'm not commenting on whether or not there should be a s:Spacer but you
don't need a new class - you just need a new manifest entry to do the
mapping. If you look in frameworks/spark-manifest.com you will see others
there.
Carol
On 12/21/12 9 :44AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
> Just curious
uctor
//
public function Spacer()
{
super();
}
}
}
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Maxime Cowez [mailto:maxime.co...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:50
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Component] Spacer
@Mark Instead of Rect, you'd
only like half a
> dozen lines or so lol.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jef...@dot-com-it.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:52
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Component] Spacer
>
>
> My personal opinion is that
2
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Component] Spacer
My personal opinion is that the MX Spacer does not need to be
re-written as a Spark Component. It won't game any benefit from being
implemented using the Spark Architecture as it has no visual display.
Is there
My personal opinion is that the MX Spacer does not need to be
re-written as a Spark Component. It won't game any benefit from being
implemented using the Spark Architecture as it has no visual display.
Is there a reason the MX Spacer won't work for you? Would extending
Rect be more effic
Just curious if we could add a simple component that used to exist in MX but
not in Spark. The spacer component was just a simple UI extension. We can do
the exact same thing now with the s:Rect (primitive), but it doesn't have an
intuitive name. I think it would be nice to add the spacer
