On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Doug McCune wrote:
>
> Saying nothing changed means you haven't been paying attention. HTML/JS is
> changing faster than almost any other technology stack out there at the
> moment. It has more momentum and developer interest than almost any other
> technology stac
Adobe did since there is no commercial agenda anymore. Adobe will probably
also improved the Flash Player as part of their own agenda and use, is
multi threading still on the map for this year?
> On 2/4/12 5:24 PM, "Stephane Beladaci"
wrote:
> OK, that's enough speculation fo
This post is a brillant example of Apple's brain washing power! If you
listen to Steve Jobs then you contribute to the spreading of a disease
that will do nothing but cripple the industry. Apple does not push
HTML5 because it is better, they push it because it does not exists
and can easily be pate
We will only see the Flash Player being open sourced if Google buy
Adobe, otherwise Adobe will rather kill it than letting competition
benefit from it.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:05 AM, JP Bader wrote:
> Jeffry's correct. Adobe is in the business to make money. They make
> great tools because th
+1, I really like this!
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hello, this is my entry for the apache flex logo contest.
>
> PNG Preview
> http://carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-final-proposal.jpg
>
> ZIP FILE
> http://carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-final-proposal.zip
>
> Be
Would it make any sense to have built in dependency injection? I use
messaging and dependency injection for almost all my projects and I am
curious as to whether or not it could be beneficial to a majority of
Flex projects?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> On 1/13/2012 9:03 PM, Stephane Beladaci wrote:
> None of that is in the formal FB docs; but I'm not surprised that FB docs
> would be incomplete or inaccurate.
Facebook has quite a few mechanisms in place that define what yo
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> So, my offensive question of the day...
> What makes you the person with proper qualifications to do this? Since you
> aren't one of the initial commiters, nor a mentor?
No offense taken, I never said I am that person, I even said that I
> You don't - go reread that thread [1], and could people please stop
> spreading FUD about such things?
> Ask the mentors if such things are unclear, instead of making up rules
> on the fly - thanks.
How do we know if what someone says is reliable or not? I am sorry for
the mistake but when the V
Hey guys, even though I do appreciate the effort to spread the word
and secure Apache Flex social presence, I believe it should be handles
for someone designated by the community with the proper
qualifications.
Also, there is another thread on the mailing list that indicates we
are in violation of
That makes sense. Do you know if Adobe Professional Services intends
to use Apache Flex once its gets ahead of Adobe Flex 4.6? If not yet,
do you think it might be a possibility?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Because Adobe wants to support its enterprise customers as best
I did not know Adobe Flex will continue to be available, do we know
for how long and what is the purpose of Adobe keeping Adobe Flex
around? I am sure the people in charge of the Adobe Flex page will be
supportive and I do not mind dealing with a temporary confusion as
long as that confusion as a t
I haven't payed attention to.
On 1/12/2012 9:46 PM, Stephane Beladaci wrote:
> So in that case what is the Facebook Adobe Flex page going to become?
> This is an issue, if people look for Flex on Facebook and find Adobe
> Flex that is an issue to me!
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 a
So in that case what is the Facebook Adobe Flex page going to become?
This is an issue, if people look for Flex on Facebook and find Adobe
Flex that is an issue to me!
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> We probably will not donate communication channels like blogs, twitter,
> fa
I strongly agree, it is important to create a clear distinction
between the past (Adobe Flex) and the future (Apache Flex), there is
already enough confusion across the board and the truth of the matter
is that Apache Flex is NOT Adobe Flex, despite the fact that the
initial code base is the same,
which is a good thing I believe, recycling the existing logo would
also create confusion, it would be saying "it is still Adobe Flex, we
just Apached it" when in fact we need to send the message that this is
not Adobe at all anymore.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Adobe is n
+1 for a clean cut distinctive definition of what Flex is, namely an
Apache project free of Adobe and open to new corporate venture /
partnership / investment. I always said and still believe Flex will
need corporate backup and sponsors to succeeded and I also understand
/ appreciate the idea of "
+1, I strongly believe the word Adobe should be nowhere to be found,
the company made a choice and from a communication standpoint I
believe the name should always be Apache Flex, that will help making
clear that this is a new product in the hand of the community, which
will hopefully help make up
I would not give too much credit to Microsoft pulling the plug on
Silverlight... Around February 20010 they joined forces with Apple in
order to kill Flash, at that point they said plugin is dead, Flash is
dead and viva HTML.Then came a new version of Silverlight, at which
point they went public an
Velocity, adoption and PR will definitely brings HTML closer however I
personally believe that the very nature of W3C standard will always
make the HTML5 stack slower to evolve and innovate. Look at Apple
currently crippling HTML5 audio and video on iOS Safari to protect its
native ecosystem and av
Flex has no competition in the RIA space I do not consider HTML
remotely close to a RIA technology, it's a W3C standard and as such it
will never be capable to evolve and innovate as rapidly as other
technologies that are not controlled and crippled by competing
interest of the giants who all sit a
What about Spark skinning and performance? Does Spark skinning affects
or not the performance of an application? I personally really like
Spark and tend to prefer skins over lose CSS styling, however I heard
from some colleague that Spark skinning had negative effect on
performance, I was never abl
I think it is time for us to stop trying to make sense of Adobe's
decisions and strategy, it is not the first time Adobe spent a lot of
time and effort for nothing (Flash Lite anyone?). We should not base
any choice or decision on what Adobe did or did not, their interest
(selling tools and apparen
23 matches
Mail list logo
