as helpers (hgroup cough vgroup cough).
--
Jonathan Campos
ts. And Flex runs
great on these projects :)
--
Jonathan Campos
ck to blogging and including this info. Sadly you
probably shouldn't expect this writeup for another two weeks or so. If you
feel semi comfortable with this code you could easily make the changes
yourself. They are pretty simple.
--
Jonathan Campos
hem all together
3. do a little manipulation on robotlegs to properly support the events for
mapping onRegister/onRemove. This way I can use the FeathersUI "ViewStack"
component.
4. continue business as usual building the application. Yes, styling isn't
nearly as easy but it is possible.
HTH
--
Jonathan Campos
t;>
> >> On 11/19/12 10:03 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> >>
> >>> [ X ] +1 Graduate Apache Flex from Incubator
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Carol (binding)
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ix Multimedia Software
> >
> > Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > 3521 VB Utrecht
> >
> > T. 06-51952295
> > I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>
>
--
Jonathan Campos
a while back that I went the same route. Simple, but does
what I need.
[1]
https://github.com/jonbcampos/UnitedMindsetFx4Library/blob/master/src/com/unitedmindset/components/AutocompleteList.as
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> For backers; I'll be hosting routine sessions for the purpose of showing
> progress and soliciting feedback.
Just remember that if it doesn't happen on list then it didn't happen.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> +1
+1
--
Jonathan Campos
like a very "open source" minded approach.
There didn't seem to be that interest in feedback and open development.
That is what bothered me and why I have yet to back this project.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Even a brand new project?
+1 [binding]
--
Jonathan Campos
be best not with the current
iteration.
--
Jonathan Campos
stien Paturel
wrote:
> Hi jonathan,
> What is the state of this very promising project?
>
> Le 14/06/2012 18:46, Jonathan Campos a écrit :
>
> Recently I've been getting aquatinted with Starling to see if it could
>> work
>> with Flex. After a few days of playing
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote:
> downloaded and installed like a boss ;)
worked for me
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
t, it just takes people interested
in it. I will admit that I don't really miss design view, but that is just
me.
--
Jonathan Campos
While I don't agree with the tone I do agree that I don't see a point to
this poll. If you want a visual editor start building it. If people like it
then it will be picked up. It's that simple.
--
Jonathan Campos
r Java/BlazeDS that Flex
isn't for them.
--
Jonathan Campos
e people like the idea of a "roadmap", others are offended by
it. As a compromise we could have a wish list page and leave it there.
--
Jonathan Campos
1]
[1] http://www.spoon.as/community-revue-archive/
--
Jonathan Campos
s. I'd be
interested in hearing what others would think of this.
--
Jonathan Campos
ponents. However usually the purpose was unique and therefore not worth
sharing.
--
Jonathan Campos
t; the spark base classes API.
>
I would try creating a whiteboard and putting your components in there. Let
other people see them and choose to get involved. With momentum they may be
brought in.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> Mike
Fifth, you rock.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> 9. Git Branching Model on Git now (see Note 2)
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Git Branching Model on Git now: 2
Anything that makes it even a little harder for people to be involved or
contribute should be removed. Working with Git for a while I don't see an
equal for open development.
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> +1 except remove projects directory and put each project at top-level and
> add tags subdirectory under each project
>
Agreed with Carol.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Peter Elst wrote:
> 1
>
> IMHO seems like a better practice and make it a more formal workflow for
> getting things into the trunk.
>
version 1
--
Jonathan Campos
ing
> Apache Flex. Work already done in patches branch. Namespace is valid URL
> and was suggested by a mentor.
> Disadvantages: It's a new namespace.
>
I like this idea but maybe an "experimental" namespace and then the
official "apache" namespace or spark, etc.
--
Jonathan Campos
eel ok.
>
Agreed Alex on the experimental branches. The odd/even versioning just is
confusing. We would have to explain over and over again which one to use,
not use, is experimental, or not.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Rick Winscot wrote:
> Anyone thinking about adopting an even / odd numbering system to denote
> stable / development releases?
Is that status quo for other apache projects?
--
Jonathan Campos
compatibility
changes.
--
Jonathan Campos
e information.
>
> Good job everyone.
>
Awesome job everyone. And great job Carol, Alex, nick, Om, Justin and
everyone else that made everyone else's life easier during this release
cycle :)
--
Jonathan Campos
After looking at the issue and getting some basic stuff working I can say
that it will take a pretty significant code split to make work. This would
be something best planned into a flex 5 development.
On Jul 15, 2012 3:32 AM, "Williams Farias" wrote:
> Hey
> imagene...@gmail.com,
>
> Do you have
n. I'm just re-raising the issue.
--
Jonathan Campos
; wrote:
> I would welcome it. I could list reasons but it's an issue we're all common
> with.
>
> PS Maybe add discuss or vote tags to the thread :)
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Campos >wrote:
>
> > As we are getting closer to our first re
nks for the efforts!
--
Jonathan Campos
eally good ideas over there that are
usable.
If someone wants to run with this idea then great. When some code is
completed then we can talk about if it goes into Flex or not. Just saying
no at the beginning isn't helpful to anyone.
--
Jonathan Campos
and be done.
Something like this could be very powerful to help sharing.
It isn't a bad idea. Don't focus on the Ruby side of it; just put it into
Flexxy terms.
--
Jonathan Campos
ually an idea I like. I don't like the idea that people think
every new version needs to have HBox/HGroup/H-Whatever equivalents. This
would make it so that some people can work on the core and it's performance
and all tertiary libraries just bask in the updating goodness.
--
Jonathan Campos
gle IO and the craziness of coming back to work
after being gone for a week I wasn't able to test earlier.
--
Jonathan Campos
had a solution.
The bigger problem is having this work with the current solution. To be
more versatile will require some rework.
--
Jonathan Campos
playObject for a Starling DisplayObject.
Just thinking out loud at this point.
--
Jonathan Campos
e been making some very bad
> decisions Maybe good for them but definitely not for some of us
>
Rafael, Great thoughts. If you want to see what others are thinking of this
topic feel free to do a quick search in the maillist. This exact topic
comes up roughly once every other week.
--
Jonathan Campos
Keeping up with the mailig list you can tell that the community seems
focused on getting out a parity release of the flex framework in its
entirety. With the monumental task completed I am sure there are many
people, based on the quantity of users, that will be spending time and
continuing to impro
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> I like the first one quite a bit.
ditto
--
Jonathan Campos
ting way too much.
In the next framework rounds we can make many more of these changes and
tools companies will have the time to plan the change.
My 2 cents.
--
Jonathan Campos
actored sdk?
Get out of my head.
I think that even a day of coding may be too much effort to expect from
some groups. Such as the before mentioned.
--
Jonathan Campos
gree with Om. We don't want to get into the (very) bad habit of
"we're going to make a change and you need to move with us". Tool
developers don't like that very much. I think the fewer waves we make to
the ecosystem during the 4.x branch the better.
--
Jonathan Campos
4
features and whatever else that is off topic.
--
Jonathan Campos
feel free to start a thread on a blog of your choosing but please keep this
list to discussion specifically on the Flex framework.
--
Jonathan Campos
ibuting code, submit
patches, discuss issues, display an attitude befitting a committer, help
others and be active on the mailing list and you're sure to have an invite
pretty quickly.
--
Jonathan Campos
on-jobadmin" group. I've subscribed to the infrastructure and build
> mailing lists.
>
I'd be interested too: jonbcampos
--
Jonathan Campos
As I've set up Hudson and Jenkins before I would prefer them. Great systems.
On May 8, 2012 7:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/8/12 4:51 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm happy to work on this I'm more familiar with Jenkins/Hudson than
> Buildbot
> > so would request that.
n in flex-users or stackoverflow.
--
Jonathan Campos
ticket. I'm personally not
committing to keeping up with the build server but I'm sure there are
plenty. Right now I am a bit swamped to be held responsible for this.
--
Jonathan Campos
As a non committer he can't even make a ticket?
On May 8, 2012 12:29 PM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jonathan Campos
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Clint Modien wrote:
> >
> >> Team… who should create
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Clint Modien wrote:
> Team… who should create the ticket?
sounds like a job for... Clint
--
Jonathan Campos
If you have a problem with the details provided in the readme just write
new details and get them in. Easy as that.
Be positive and keep moving forward.
On May 4, 2012 5:15 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/4/12 3:01 PM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
>
> > I get download results on the firs
ust run on creation complete and then
never again?
Seems problematic.
--
Jonathan Campos
anything else.
--
Jonathan Campos
users feel that the list isn't responding?
--
Jonathan Campos
Sounds like a job for... Rick winscot!
On Apr 19, 2012 9:44 AM, "Rick Winscot" wrote:
> I know that some of this work is being done to track missing components an
> such... but is anyone making a list of core / framework items ( i.e.
> fonts.jar ) that are not being contributed?
>
> R
arguing about what was said. Start
contributing to the open source and keep moving forward.
--
Jonathan Campos
When I get some time I have most of these working though code reviews would
help. I also have about a dozen common mobile optimized item renderers that
would be good to include in an add on pack.
On Apr 12, 2012 8:05 PM, "Francis Altomare"
wrote:
> General question.
>
> Has anyone heard anything
ere you having? I've successfully used the asdoc ant task for
huge projects including mxml and as files.
--
Jonathan Campos
Someone call Ben! (Reflex)
On Apr 10, 2012 4:06 PM, "Erik Lundgren" wrote:
>
> 10 apr 2012 kl. 21.08 skrev Michael A. Labriola:
>
> > It could certainly be added, but I would like you to consider thinking
> about it a different way. Rather than adding more heft to the base
> component, we could a
bjEvent.property = index.toString() + "." + event.property;
>dispatchEvent(objEvent);
>
I would agree with this change as uints also are very error prone on a
variety of air targets and ints are uniform across platforms.
--
Jonathan Campos
Just as a "me too" I can say that not checking in the .* files is the way
to go when working in teams. There are many problems it solves. I
completely agree with nick here.
On Apr 7, 2012 8:18 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Your Flex 4.6 is not the same as my Flex 4.6. They are close, but t
Sorry, thought I was assumed to be there. Except for speaking and heckling
I will be there.
On Apr 4, 2012 12:40 PM, "Jun Heider" wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote:
>
> > me and Christophe Herreman will probably hang out in the Apache Flex room
> > as well, so if you need
ay that I have zero interest
in breaking every flex app, example, book, and piece of documentation for a
change that is mainly personal preference. I think that is pretty fair
reasoning.
--
Jonathan Campos
Honestly I'm not even sure I would want to vote for using "org.apache.flex"
as a package name. While thinking about it I like the fact that Adobe stuck
with spark.* and mx.*.
We've talked about namespaces before and I voted to not use the "apache" ns
there too. Would prefer a more descriptive name
On Mar 31, 2012 9:24 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
>
> Issue 1 : +1
> Issue 2 : -1
>
> (Binding Votes)
>
1) +1
2) -1
Binding.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> It will be one less box of
> stuff to bring along and risk losing on the way.
>
We could always send it to Jun or John Wilker. Both are in Denver.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Mar 16, 2012 8:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If we make no changes it probably means that down the track we're likely
to end up with this:
>
> xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009";
>xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
>xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe
I think adding a default namespace only adds confusion.
"So why do I leave this components namespace blank and set another?"
I would drop the idea for default namespaces
On Mar 16, 2012 6:37 PM, "Left Right" wrote:
> No-no-no :)
> Framework code is an extension, an add-on. There is absolutely n
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Tink wrote:
> You mean relative positioning to another component, or providing a series
> of absolute x and y positions?
Exactly. I have solutions already for the issue also. Just raising a flag.
--
Jonathan Campos
x27;ve long since extended the
SkinnablePopups to include additional parameters similar to the callout's
functionality. Then the updatePosition (or whatever) function uses those
parameters to position itself.
I'd probably push to add a few positioning parameters to the
SkinnablePopups.
--
Jonathan Campos
y
projects. I would prefer that we stick with using the popupmanager as it is
the way most people are used to working with the framework.
Also I would prefer to have a modal ability as with tablet applications
modal is still very important.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> I was asking about an organizer/etc. that would order (and take) the pins
> for 360flex.
No worries. If someone wants to handle this that is fine. Spoon is planning
on taking care of that for the community.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm afraid to ask but can anyone offer up a design? Maybe the current logo
> with the word "Committer" underneath?
>
We can see what garth comes up with
--
Jonathan Campos
>
> Also, I've been thinking about buttons or ribbons for Apache Flex
> committers. Thoughts on that?
>
Maybe a sign that says "buy me a drink and ill can commit your code.
Just kidding but buttons are a great idea.
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com
on would disagree with you. I think he was saying if you
wanted to have some sort of s:Application without declaring xmlns:s then it
wouldn't be valid XML markup. What you are saying is to just declare an ""
ns.
--
Jonathan Campos
I may be convinced to have a namespace for experimental
> components.
> Any idea what you would name it?
No idea. This is just talking out loud but it may be good for one of the
branches that are more in development rather than the trunk. The trunk
would always have finalized names and packages. This would be more for
those developers that like to live on the edge.
--
Jonathan Campos
tally on
the fence about that.
--
Jonathan Campos
cheme. I would prefer that from now on we use a valid url
whether or not it actually points to anything.
--
Jonathan Campos
help start dev'ing something and do the same. That
sounds like a great actionable item.
--
Jonathan Campos
and other issues that GPU rendering would cause, I am sure there are plenty
of projects that would also be improved that accessibility may not be an
issue.
--
Jonathan Campos
ay be a bad idea due to various
platforms and versions, but something to consider. It could be very helpful
for those very common use cases that span multiple platforms.
J
--
Jonathan Campos
your
component.
--
Jonathan Campos
oint
> to spark.component.Application.controlBarContent, because it no longer
> makes sense to have that component.
>
I think we are on the same page now.
--
Jonathan Campos
th the 1-1 list, just because it was
done once doesn't mean it should be done the same way forever.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Om wrote:
> Because in some cases, you cant. For example, mx:TabNavigator will not
> take non Halo components as children. There are workarounds needed in some
> cases where you mix mx and spark components.
>
Yup, the NavigationContent component.
ch better argument and that should be something we can fix
up. Though I am guessing you won't see any "spark only" radio buttons in
Flash Builder.
--
Jonathan Campos
ts the same exact way".
--
Jonathan Campos
understand personal preference to see s: instead of mx: I
don't really think that this is a huge necessity.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
> Does ButtonBar do that?
Honestly I haven't tried to make a ToggleButtonBar so I can't say. I want
to say it does, but there is always some margin for error.
--
Jonathan Campos
ady.
--
Jonathan Campos
part of the framework you can choose, or choose not to, use.
>
I would be much happier with an add-on set than additional bloat to the
core.
--
Jonathan Campos
ace that many people
have shared code.
Other than that things are all over: people's blogs, github, google code.
That could use some gelling.
--
Jonathan Campos
through the
frameworks design.
--
Jonathan Campos
hould they all be directly in the framework? That is up for discussion.
Could they easily be some sort of "and the kitchen sink" add-on, definitely.
--
Jonathan Campos
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
