Honestly I'm not even sure I would want to vote for using "org.apache.flex" as a package name. While thinking about it I like the fact that Adobe stuck with spark.* and mx.*.
We've talked about namespaces before and I voted to not use the "apache" ns there too. Would prefer a more descriptive name specific to the component set. On Mar 31, 2012 12:06 AM, "Martin Heidegger" <m...@leichtgewicht.at> wrote: > I found that the discussion about the "org.apache.flex" package was not > finished and there is still the ISSUE Flex-7[1] open. > > So I suggest that we start voting on that, please vote on following points: > > 1) Keep the current package names in the first Apache Flex release 4.8 > 2) Change the package names in the first major Apache release 5 > > Anything beyond that is too far in the future to discuss that now imho. > > yours > Martin > > PS.: Please read about the apache voting process [2] if you are not sure > what the options are. > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/FLEX-7<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-7> > [2] > http://www.apache.org/**foundation/voting.html<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >
